Comparison Overview

Charity Link

VS

Booster

Charity Link

8 Castle End Business Park, Reading, undefined, RG10 9XQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Charity Link delivers fundraising and awareness campaigns for the charity sector through our passionate, professional and ethical way of working. Founded in 1995 our passion for fundraising continues to drive and grow the business. More than 20 years on we are leaders in our field and have become known for our first class standards and integrity. Our Head Office is based in the beautiful rural countryside of Ruscombe but our passion for fundraising runs nationwide. We train hundreds of highly skilled fundraisers who work right across the country to help drive our charity partners’ big strategic goals. We never tire of sharing our passion. We’re incredibly proud of our team and the fantastic relationships we’ve nurtured with some of the UK’s best loved charities. Providing all our fundraisers with continuous support, mentoring and industry-leading training is key to our success. It’s what sets us apart from our competitors and what keeps our standards so high. We are always on the look out for great talent - so if you are a highly motivated, articulate and passionate person that genuinely loves talking to people – please get in touch today.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Booster

undefined, Peachtree Corners, Georgia, 30092, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21

In 2002, Chris Carneal founded Booster to help strengthen schools. Since then, Booster has offered ever expanding school fundraising services from fun runs to a school fundraising platform, custom gear to product sales. What’s our secret? It’s simple – we do more so you do less. Our specially designed programs, our un-matched service and second-to-none quality ensures you exceed your fundraising goals year after year. You have chosen the proven leader in fundraising, so relax, we got this.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 613
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/booster-enterprises.jpeg
Booster
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charity Link
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Booster
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charity Link in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Booster in 2025.

Incident History — Charity Link (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charity Link cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Booster (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Booster cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charity-link.jpeg
Charity Link
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/booster-enterprises.jpeg
Booster
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Booster company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charity Link company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Booster company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charity Link company.

In the current year, Booster company and Charity Link company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Booster company nor Charity Link company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Booster company nor Charity Link company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Booster company nor Charity Link company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charity Link company nor Booster company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charity Link nor Booster holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Booster company and Charity Link company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Booster company employs more people globally than Charity Link company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Charity Link nor Booster holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charity Link nor Booster holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charity Link nor Booster holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charity Link nor Booster holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charity Link nor Booster holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charity Link nor Booster holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N