Comparison Overview

Channel Marker, Inc.

VS

The Bridge

Channel Marker, Inc.

8865 Glebe Park Drive Unit 1, None, Easton, MD, US, 21601
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.channelmarker.org

Founded in 1982, Channel Marker provides mental health and wellness support for adults and youth with severe mental illness in Caroline, Dorchester, and Talbot counties. Through a wide range of on-site, residential and community based services specifically tailored to the needs of each client, more than 55 clinical and mental health services staff serve an average of 400 clients each year. Funding for our work primarily comes from Medicaid with support from generous members of the community, the State of Maryland, and private foundations. OUR MISSION Channel Marker creates a healthy Mid-Shore community by providing mental illness treatment and prevention programs, wellness support, and community services to individuals and their families.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Bridge

248 W. 108th Street, New York, NY, 10025, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://thebridgeny.org/

Founded in 1954, The Bridge is a non profit 501 (c) (3) organization that has developed into one of New York City’s premier rehabilitation agencies. The Bridge provides mental health and substance abuse treatment, housing, vocational training and job placement, healthcare, education and creative arts therapy to 2,300 men and women in Manhattan, The Bronx, Brooklyn and Queens. A leader and innovator, The Bridge offers the highest quality services and continues to develop model programs that have been replicated nationally and internationally.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 569
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/channel-marker-inc.jpeg
Channel Marker, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bridge-inc-_2.jpeg
The Bridge
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Channel Marker, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Bridge
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Channel Marker, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bridge in 2026.

Incident History — Channel Marker, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Channel Marker, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Bridge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bridge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/channel-marker-inc.jpeg
Channel Marker, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bridge-inc-_2.jpeg
The Bridge
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Bridge company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Channel Marker, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Bridge company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Channel Marker, Inc. company.

In the current year, The Bridge company and Channel Marker, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Bridge company nor Channel Marker, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Bridge company nor Channel Marker, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Bridge company nor Channel Marker, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. company nor The Bridge company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor The Bridge holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Bridge company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Channel Marker, Inc. company.

The Bridge company employs more people globally than Channel Marker, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor The Bridge holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor The Bridge holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor The Bridge holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor The Bridge holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor The Bridge holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor The Bridge holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References