Comparison Overview

Channel Marker, Inc.

VS

Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County

Channel Marker, Inc.

8865 Glebe Park Drive Unit 1, None, Easton, MD, US, 21601
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1982, Channel Marker provides mental health and wellness support for adults and youth with severe mental illness in Caroline, Dorchester, and Talbot counties. Through a wide range of on-site, residential and community based services specifically tailored to the needs of each client, more than 55 clinical and mental health services staff serve an average of 400 clients each year. Funding for our work primarily comes from Medicaid with support from generous members of the community, the State of Maryland, and private foundations. OUR MISSION Channel Marker creates a healthy Mid-Shore community by providing mental illness treatment and prevention programs, wellness support, and community services to individuals and their families.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County

16220 Frederick Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20877, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

We are a private mental health practice offering individual, family, couples, and group therapy for children (birth -12,) adolescents (13 –17), adults (18 - 65) and seniors (66+). Our therapy staff consists of over 30 experienced, licensed Clinical Social Workers, Professional Counselors, Psychologists of diverse nationalities, languages and ages. Our main oiffice is based in Gaithersburg, Maryland. Our therapists help you cope with stress, grief, anxiety, depression, phobias, adoption, divorce, aging, and other life challenges. Outside the office we run specialized community based programs for high-risk, uninsured or underinsured children, adults, and families within Montgomery County. These program specialize in pre-natal and post-partum depression, aging, integrated behavioral health and support groups for young adults with multiple sclerosis, and parents of children with disabilities.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/channel-marker-inc.jpeg
Channel Marker, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspire-counseling-montgomery-county.jpeg
Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Channel Marker, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Channel Marker, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County in 2026.

Incident History — Channel Marker, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Channel Marker, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/channel-marker-inc.jpeg
Channel Marker, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspire-counseling-montgomery-county.jpeg
Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Channel Marker, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Channel Marker, Inc. company.

In the current year, Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company and Channel Marker, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company nor Channel Marker, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company nor Channel Marker, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company nor Channel Marker, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. company nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. company nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Channel Marker, Inc. company employs more people globally than Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Channel Marker, Inc. nor Aspire Counseling: Montgomery County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H