Comparison Overview

Chamberlain McHaney

VS

Cogent Law Group LLP

Chamberlain McHaney

US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Chamberlain ♦ McHaney is the premier civil litigation firm in Central Texas with offices in Austin and San Antonio. We have prosecuted and defended multi-million dollar cases with success in numerous venues throughout the state. Our firm is listed in Best's Directory of Attorneys and is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell. We represent clients, including Fortune 500 companies and major insurers, in all major areas of litigation. In particular, we represent manufacturers and retailers in cases involving product liability and negligence; oil and gas litigation; environmental pollution litigation; health care providers in medical malpractice claims; public and private employers in disputes in employment litigation, including class actions and cases involving Title VII, Section 1983, the ADEA and the ADA; public and private land owners and occupiers and general and subcontractors in premises liability and construction site accident cases; trucking and transportation litigation; state administrative law claims; professionals in malpractice cases; and we represent individuals, business corporations and partnerships in disputes involving contract claims and business torts.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cogent Law Group LLP

1875 K St NW, Washington, DC, 20006, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our Mission Cogent has assembled a group of senior attorneys who developed their deep expertise: representing clients at major law firms serving in senior government positions, and founding and leading tech and alternative currency startups. Our advice is rooted in entrepreneurial experience. We are energized by working with fast-growing clients. With our unique team and our low-overhead business model, Cogent delivers top-tier services without the big-law rates. We provide innovative solutions and look for opportunities to connect clients to our network of service providers, organizations, investors, and potential customers.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Chamberlain McHaney
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cogent-law-group-llp.jpeg
Cogent Law Group LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chamberlain McHaney
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cogent Law Group LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chamberlain McHaney in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cogent Law Group LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Chamberlain McHaney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chamberlain McHaney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cogent Law Group LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cogent Law Group LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Chamberlain McHaney
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cogent-law-group-llp.jpeg
Cogent Law Group LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chamberlain McHaney company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cogent Law Group LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cogent Law Group LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chamberlain McHaney company.

In the current year, Cogent Law Group LLP company and Chamberlain McHaney company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP company nor Chamberlain McHaney company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP company nor Chamberlain McHaney company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP company nor Chamberlain McHaney company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chamberlain McHaney company nor Cogent Law Group LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chamberlain McHaney nor Cogent Law Group LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chamberlain McHaney company nor Cogent Law Group LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cogent Law Group LLP company employs more people globally than Chamberlain McHaney company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Chamberlain McHaney nor Cogent Law Group LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chamberlain McHaney nor Cogent Law Group LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chamberlain McHaney nor Cogent Law Group LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chamberlain McHaney nor Cogent Law Group LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chamberlain McHaney nor Cogent Law Group LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chamberlain McHaney nor Cogent Law Group LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X