Comparison Overview

Challenge:Future

VS

Institut Henri Poincaré

Challenge:Future

Technology Park - Pot za Brdom 100, Ljubljana, undefined, 1000, SI
Last Update: 2025-12-02

At www.challengefuture.org (C:F) we are a global youth community based Think-DO-Tank, focused on sustainability, innovation and creation of positive impact. Our mission is to actively engage the global youth and to accelerate ideas, talent and leadership, so during the year we run different competitions and quick challenges, where we connect & challenge global youth to colloborate and contribute for designing and implementing a better future for everyone.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Institut Henri Poincaré

11, Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 700 and 749

The Institut Henri Poincaré (IHP) is an international research centre in mathematics and theoretical physics founded by Émile Borel. It is located in the centre of Paris next to two other institutes founded in the 1920s, the Institut Curie and the Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique. Opposite the Borel building, the historic IHP building, is the former physical chemistry laboratory of Jean Perrin. Completely refurbished to host an expanded IHP, the Perrin building accommodates various types of scientific activities and the Maison Poincaré, a museum dedicated to mathematics and its interactions.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/challenge-future.jpeg
Challenge:Future
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ihp-paris.jpeg
Institut Henri Poincaré
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Challenge:Future
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institut Henri Poincaré
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Challenge:Future in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institut Henri Poincaré in 2025.

Incident History — Challenge:Future (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Challenge:Future cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institut Henri Poincaré (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institut Henri Poincaré cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/challenge-future.jpeg
Challenge:Future
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ihp-paris.jpeg
Institut Henri Poincaré
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Challenge:Future company and Institut Henri Poincaré company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Institut Henri Poincaré company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Challenge:Future company.

In the current year, Institut Henri Poincaré company and Challenge:Future company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institut Henri Poincaré company nor Challenge:Future company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Institut Henri Poincaré company nor Challenge:Future company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Institut Henri Poincaré company nor Challenge:Future company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Challenge:Future company nor Institut Henri Poincaré company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Challenge:Future nor Institut Henri Poincaré holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Challenge:Future company nor Institut Henri Poincaré company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Institut Henri Poincaré company employs more people globally than Challenge:Future company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Challenge:Future nor Institut Henri Poincaré holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Challenge:Future nor Institut Henri Poincaré holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Challenge:Future nor Institut Henri Poincaré holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Challenge:Future nor Institut Henri Poincaré holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Challenge:Future nor Institut Henri Poincaré holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Challenge:Future nor Institut Henri Poincaré holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X