Comparison Overview

Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO)

VS

TransitMatters

Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO)

221 NW 2nd Ave, Portland, OR, 97209, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

At Foundations for a Better Oregon, we seek to demystify and reimagine how our systems support every child to learn, grow, and thrive. Through policy advocacy, convening, research, and storytelling, we lift up community-driven solutions that promise to disrupt injustice and radically accelerate progress for children. Formerly known as Chalkboard Project, we are a statewide nonprofit organization and a project of Oregon philanthropy, bridging community, policymakers, and foundations to envision and advance a better Oregon where every child knows that they belong.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TransitMatters

62 Summer St. , Boston, MA, 02110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

TransitMatters is an advocacy group dedicated to improving transit in and around Boston by offering new perspectives, uniting transit advocates, educating riders and promoting a level of critical analysis normally absent from other media. We advocate for plans and policies that promote convenient and effective transportation for everyone. TransitMatters' envisions a set of six high-impact solutions to improve the transit experience for MBTA riders; solutions with positive impacts that far outweigh the cost of implementation. We must vastly improve our public transport network to work for all citizens of the Commonwealth, improving equity, mobility, air quality, and economic opportunity. Transit Matters Initiatives: - Night Bus - Regional Rail - NextGen Bus - Fair Fares - Mobility Hubs - Red-Blue Connector

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chalkboard-project.jpeg
Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transitmatters.jpeg
TransitMatters
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TransitMatters
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TransitMatters in 2025.

Incident History — Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TransitMatters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TransitMatters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chalkboard-project.jpeg
Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transitmatters.jpeg
TransitMatters
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) company and TransitMatters company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, TransitMatters company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) company.

In the current year, TransitMatters company and Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TransitMatters company nor Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TransitMatters company nor Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TransitMatters company nor Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) company nor TransitMatters company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) nor TransitMatters holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) company nor TransitMatters company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TransitMatters company employs more people globally than Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) nor TransitMatters holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) nor TransitMatters holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) nor TransitMatters holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) nor TransitMatters holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) nor TransitMatters holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foundations for a Better Oregon (FBO) nor TransitMatters holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H