Comparison Overview

CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install

VS

Metcom, Inc.

CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install

6950 Hall St, Holland, Ohio, 43528, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cgs-imaging.com

CGS Imaging is a full-service graphics manufacturer, specializing in wide format and grand format imaging applications. As a leader in the digital printing industry, we enlist the latest techniques, materials and technologies to help our clients achieve maximum impact. Our team at CGS Imaging relies on expertise and experience to provide quick turnaround and extremely competitive pricing, without sacrificing the exceptional quality and customer service we are known for delivering.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Metcom, Inc.

21643 East Nine Mile Road, Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, 48080, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.metcom-inc.com

At Metcom, we save business and governmental agencies time, money and hassle by managing and supplying critical business needs including web stores, print and graphic services, supply chain and technology products, branded apparel, and logo merchandise. We strive to produce an extreme focus on customer support and value. You can trust us to deliver what we promise. That's the Metcom guarantee. Metcom's niche markets include food service & wholesale distribution, libraries, municipal & state government, property management, manufacturing, auto dealerships and district courts. Some of our products: print, labels, office products, mail and online marketing campaigns, personal protective equipment, and promotional and apparel products. Products and services include business printing and forms, online print management, consumable inventory and distribution services, office product programs, branded promotional products, labels, tags and thermal products, branded apparel, commercial printing and mailing services, concept and design, and online brand stores.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgs-imaging.jpeg
CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metcom-inc..jpeg
Metcom, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metcom, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metcom, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metcom, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metcom, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgs-imaging.jpeg
CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metcom-inc..jpeg
Metcom, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Metcom, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Metcom, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company.

In the current year, Metcom, Inc. company and CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metcom, Inc. company nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Metcom, Inc. company nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Metcom, Inc. company nor CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company nor Metcom, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install nor Metcom, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company nor Metcom, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install company employs more people globally than Metcom, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install nor Metcom, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install nor Metcom, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install nor Metcom, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install nor Metcom, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install nor Metcom, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CGS Imaging - Print • Manufacture • Install nor Metcom, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References