Comparison Overview

CGM Hampshire Solicitors

VS

Right Legal Group

CGM Hampshire Solicitors

Enterprise House, Southampton , England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

"On Your Side"​ The family firm of McCarrahers was established before the Second World War. This became Christopher Green McCarrahers following a merger between McCarrahers and Christopher Green & Partners in April 2000. Despite the recent harsh economic climate the firm has continued to expand, with Chartahouse Licensed Conveyancers in Southampton joining us in 2008 and Blatch & Co Solicitors in 2011.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Right Legal Group

Right Legal Group, 16 Stanier Way, Wyvern Business Park , Derby, Derbyshire, DE21 6BF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Right Legal Group is a well-established law firm that forms part of a network of Law firms that specialise in Wills and Probate services. We are fully authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). We have offices based across the country including Derby, Bristol, Brighton and Cardiff. Our mission is to proactively look after our clients throughout their lifetime ensuring that their estate planning documents are always accurate and up to date. We provide opportunities for our clients to take control of how they want to be remembered and empower them to tell their own story, through our unique RightWill platform. Our drive to deliver our service comes from a passion to help Keep Families Together during one of the most difficult times a person can face. Call Right Legal Group on 01332 424 511 or get in touch with us through our website.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgm-solicitors.jpeg
CGM Hampshire Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CGM Hampshire Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Right Legal Group
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CGM Hampshire Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Right Legal Group in 2025.

Incident History — CGM Hampshire Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CGM Hampshire Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Right Legal Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Right Legal Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgm-solicitors.jpeg
CGM Hampshire Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/right-legal-group.jpeg
Right Legal Group
Incidents

FAQ

Both CGM Hampshire Solicitors company and Right Legal Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Right Legal Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CGM Hampshire Solicitors company.

In the current year, Right Legal Group company and CGM Hampshire Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Right Legal Group company nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Right Legal Group company nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Right Legal Group company nor CGM Hampshire Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors company nor Right Legal Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors nor Right Legal Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Right Legal Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CGM Hampshire Solicitors company.

Right Legal Group company employs more people globally than CGM Hampshire Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors nor Right Legal Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors nor Right Legal Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors nor Right Legal Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors nor Right Legal Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors nor Right Legal Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CGM Hampshire Solicitors nor Right Legal Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X