Comparison Overview

CGF

VS

Studio 369

CGF

Inspektowa 11 Poznań, wielkopolskie 61-680, PL
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

The company focuses on several kinds of photography: studio, wedding, outdoor sessions, events, corporate photos. Almost 4 years of being on a market and over 25 years of being interested in photography. Many years of experience, head full of ideas, trying to be creative as much as possible. See more at the company's website http://obywatelgc.com

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio 369

Andheri Ghatkopar Link Road Flyover, Mumbai, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Studio 369 is founded by Saaket Shrikant, a professional advertising photographer and filmmaker with over 24 years of experience. He is commissioned by leading global companies for his precision to details and exquisite control of light. His foundation of commercial arts endows him with profound knowledge of branding and advertising, which further enhances his understanding of the requirements and executing balance of colours, composition and aesthetics. Being a disciple of Mr. Sachin Pilgaokar and having done several movies with him, adds magic to his films. Saakets’s work covers jewelry, products, entertainment and fashion photography for commercial clients. A profession born out of passion has grown to shoot still pictures as well as films for the luxury and manufacturing industry. His USP of showcasing the product by capturing true colours and intricate details, brings alive the natural glow and glitter of all precious and semiprecious stones/metal and perfect mood with model shoot. Hence he is the only one who can do justice to cladding your product with glamour before it enters the market.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgf.jpeg
CGF
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio369.jpeg
Studio 369
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CGF
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio 369
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CGF in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio 369 in 2025.

Incident History — CGF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CGF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio 369 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio 369 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgf.jpeg
CGF
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio369.jpeg
Studio 369
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Studio 369 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CGF company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio 369 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CGF company.

In the current year, Studio 369 company and CGF company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio 369 company nor CGF company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio 369 company nor CGF company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio 369 company nor CGF company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CGF company nor Studio 369 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CGF nor Studio 369 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CGF company nor Studio 369 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither CGF nor Studio 369 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CGF nor Studio 369 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CGF nor Studio 369 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CGF nor Studio 369 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CGF nor Studio 369 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CGF nor Studio 369 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N