Comparison Overview

Compagnie Francaise Informatique

VS

IBM

Compagnie Francaise Informatique

5, rue Pleyel, Saint Denis Cedex, undefined, 93283, FR
Last Update: 2026-02-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cfigroupe.com

CFI est un leader français de la distribution et des services informatiques. Depuis plus de 40 ans, nous accompagnons les moyennes et grandes entreprises dans l'évolution de leur système d'information et proposons un large éventail d'offres de matériels et de services associés. Face au rythme des changements technologiques, le positionnement de CFI évolue rapidement vers un rôle d'intégrateur de solutions métiers, permettant de proposer au travers d’écosystèmes de partenaires, la mise en œuvre de ces solutions et leur paiement à l'usage.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 600 and 649
http://www.ibm.com

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and consulting, then we want to work with you. We're here to help every creator turn their "what if" into what is. Let's create something that will change everything.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 341,860
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cfigroupe.jpeg
Compagnie Francaise Informatique
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ibm.jpeg
IBM
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Compagnie Francaise Informatique
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IBM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compagnie Francaise Informatique in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

IBM has 39.02% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Compagnie Francaise Informatique (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compagnie Francaise Informatique cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cfigroupe.jpeg
Compagnie Francaise Informatique
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ibm.jpeg
IBM
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: phishing, weak_passwords, improper_data_handling
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: AI supply chain and model attacks
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Compagnie Francaise Informatique company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IBM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

IBM company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Compagnie Francaise Informatique company has not reported any.

In the current year, IBM company has reported more cyber incidents than Compagnie Francaise Informatique company.

Neither IBM company nor Compagnie Francaise Informatique company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

IBM company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Compagnie Francaise Informatique company has not reported such incidents publicly.

IBM company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Compagnie Francaise Informatique company has not reported such incidents publicly.

IBM company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Compagnie Francaise Informatique company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Compagnie Francaise Informatique nor IBM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IBM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Compagnie Francaise Informatique company.

IBM company employs more people globally than Compagnie Francaise Informatique company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Compagnie Francaise Informatique nor IBM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Compagnie Francaise Informatique nor IBM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Compagnie Francaise Informatique nor IBM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Compagnie Francaise Informatique nor IBM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Compagnie Francaise Informatique nor IBM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Compagnie Francaise Informatique nor IBM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References