Comparison Overview

CFGA Law

VS

Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC

CFGA Law

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

Corina Fassouli Grafanaki & Associates Law Firm, was founded in 1981 in Athens, Greece. We distinguish ourselves for our emphasis on providing superior, individualized client service and select our attorneys based on the core premise that the practice of law requires commitment, persistence, extensive knowledge, outstanding skills and unwavering responsiveness. The range and depth of our expertise enables us to provide high-quality, high-value work and handle large projects affordably and efficiently. Our clients range from individuals and privately held companies, to banks and public corporations, as well as venture capital firms and private equity funds. Our clients operate in several different industries, such as manufacturing, transportation, financial institutions, renewable energy, pharmaceuticals, high technology, media, publishing, and telecommunications.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC

10670 N Central Expy, Dallas, Texas, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The mission of Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC is to provide each client with the most effective, ethical legal service while achieving creative, practical, and effective solutions for the unique needs of our clients. For over thirty (30) years we have provided high-quality patent, trademark and copyright legal services in all technical fields. We pride ourselves on our availability to meet client needs as they arise, and our ability to provide expert representation without overstaffing a file. One of our specialties is assisting in-house counsel with the myriad of IP problems that arise, in a timely and cost-effective manner. Our clients often use us for “ox in the ditch” problems that require creativity in addition to IP expertise. Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC has been named as a Go-To Law Firm® in Corporate Counsel's Directory of In-House Law Departments at the Top 500 Companies in 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2013. The guide, which includes firms that deliver exceptional work for the in-house legal departments at Fortune 500® companies, named Booth Albanesi Schroeder as a “Go-To” law firm for Patent Prosecution. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Rating™ has awarded Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC with an AV® Preeminent™ rating, signifying the highest level of legal ability and adherence to professional conduct and ethics. Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC was also featured in D Magazine’s CEO edition in 2013 in an article entitled Finding Your Niche: How specialized boutique law firms can protect you and your business. Our responsiveness and stability have enabled us to establish lasting relationships with our client base – ranging from Fortune 100 companies to start-ups.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cfga-law.jpeg
CFGA Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/booth-albanesi-schroeder-llc.jpeg
Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CFGA Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CFGA Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — CFGA Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CFGA Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cfga-law.jpeg
CFGA Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/booth-albanesi-schroeder-llc.jpeg
Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CFGA Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CFGA Law company.

In the current year, Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC company and CFGA Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC company nor CFGA Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC company nor CFGA Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC company nor CFGA Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CFGA Law company nor Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CFGA Law nor Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CFGA Law company nor Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CFGA Law company employs more people globally than Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither CFGA Law nor Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CFGA Law nor Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CFGA Law nor Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CFGA Law nor Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CFGA Law nor Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CFGA Law nor Booth Albanesi Schroeder PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X