Comparison Overview

CEY Studios

VS

Fundamentium

CEY Studios

23068 W. Moonlight path, Buckeye, 85326, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

CEY Studios is a small graphic design, web and print broker based in Buckeye, Arizona. Because of our size, we enjoy working with small businesses or even entrepreneurs to nurture, grow and transform their ideas into reality. Being small doesn’t leave us short on experience. We offer not only design, web and print but also expertise with signage, exhibitions and direct marketing.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fundamentium

Calle Velázquez nº 15 1º derecha, Madrid, 28001, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

Divulgación científica y médica mediante ilustraciones, infografías y animaciones. Ponemos la imagen al servicio de la comunicación científica, el márketing farmacéutico y médico, la investigación, la docencia y el mundo editorial. Somos infografistas: nuestro equipo de profesionales del diseño realiza llamativas visualizaciones que atraerán y atraparán a su audiencia. Somos científicos: entendemos el lenguaje y las bases que mueven la vida y la tecnología. Somos periodistas: sabemos divulgar la ciencia de forma didáctica para comunicar su mensaje sin interferencias, adaptándonos al público objetivo. Contacte con nosotros y descubra cómo la ilustración, la infografía, las animaciones y el diseño pueden ayudarle a comunicar sus mensajes con claridad, para llegar a su público objetivo más eficazmente.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cey-studios.jpeg
CEY Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fundamentium.jpeg
Fundamentium
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CEY Studios
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fundamentium
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEY Studios in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fundamentium in 2025.

Incident History — CEY Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEY Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fundamentium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fundamentium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cey-studios.jpeg
CEY Studios
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fundamentium.jpeg
Fundamentium
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CEY Studios company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fundamentium company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fundamentium company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CEY Studios company.

In the current year, Fundamentium company and CEY Studios company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fundamentium company nor CEY Studios company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fundamentium company nor CEY Studios company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fundamentium company nor CEY Studios company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CEY Studios company nor Fundamentium company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CEY Studios nor Fundamentium holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CEY Studios company nor Fundamentium company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither CEY Studios nor Fundamentium holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CEY Studios nor Fundamentium holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CEY Studios nor Fundamentium holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CEY Studios nor Fundamentium holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CEY Studios nor Fundamentium holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CEY Studios nor Fundamentium holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X