Comparison Overview

Cevital SPA

VS

Tupy

Cevital SPA

Illot D, N° 6 ZHUN Garidi II, Kouba Alger, 16005, DZ
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Fondé en 1998, le groupe Cevital oeuvre pour le rayonnement et le développement de l’économie algérienne en intervenant dans des domaines variés par le biais de ses quatre pôles : le pôle agro-industrie et distribution, le pôle automotive, immobilier et services, le pôle industrie, ainsi que le pôle verre, fenêtres et fermetures. Le groupe est le fleuron du secteur privé algérien avec des activités très diversifiées et tournées vers l’export. Cevital est le premier employeur privé en Algérie et compte aujourd’hui plus de 18 000 collaborateurs qui travaillent quotidiennement à son expansion tant en Algérie qu’à l’international. Show more Show less

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tupy

Rua Albano Schmidt 3400, Joinville, Santa Catarina, BR, 89227-220
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Tupy is a Brazilian company specialized in developing and manufacturing highly-engineered structural cast iron components applied to complex metallurgical and geometrical components extensively used in capital goods that serve freight transport, construction industry, agriculture and many others industrial applications. These solutions contribute to the improvement of life standards such as, sanitation, drinking water, health, housing and the production and distribution of food. The technological innovation involved in our production and development processes is the company’s specialty that dates back more than 80 years. Tupy’s manufacturing facilities are located in Brazil and Mexico.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 10,682
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cevital-spa.jpeg
Cevital SPA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tupy.jpeg
Tupy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cevital SPA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tupy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cevital SPA in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tupy in 2025.

Incident History — Cevital SPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cevital SPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tupy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tupy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cevital-spa.jpeg
Cevital SPA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tupy.jpeg
Tupy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tupy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cevital SPA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tupy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cevital SPA company.

In the current year, Tupy company and Cevital SPA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tupy company nor Cevital SPA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tupy company nor Cevital SPA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tupy company nor Cevital SPA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cevital SPA company nor Tupy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cevital SPA nor Tupy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tupy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cevital SPA company.

Tupy company employs more people globally than Cevital SPA company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Cevital SPA nor Tupy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cevital SPA nor Tupy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cevital SPA nor Tupy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cevital SPA nor Tupy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cevital SPA nor Tupy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cevital SPA nor Tupy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H