Comparison Overview

CeTEC GmbH & Co KG

VS

T-Mobile

CeTEC GmbH & Co KG

Raiffeisenallee 12b, Oberhaching bei München, Bayern, 82041, DE
Last Update: 2025-03-19 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Unser Unternehmen: Die CeTEC ist ein hoch spezialisiertes Projekthaus für Telemetrie-, Telematik- und Off-board-Navigationssysteme mit Sitz im Süden von München, sowie Büros in Rosenheim und Breslau/Polen. Wir entwickeln Hard- und Software für Komplettsysteme, Anwendungen und extrem miniaturisierte Endgeräte. Dazu bedienen wir uns modernster Mobilfunk- und Satelliten-Technologie. Unser Leistungsspektrum erstreckt sich vom Prototypenbau über Kleinstserien für Spezialanwendungen bis hin zur Entwicklung und Serienfertigung für komplette Sicherheits-, Ortungs-, Kommunikations- und Telemedizinsysteme. Wir entwickeln die komplette Hard- und Software für unsere Produkte bei uns im Hause. Als Spezialisten für anspruchsvolle Technologie-Projekte genießen wir national wie international einen ausgezeichneten Ruf in unserer Branche. Vision & Mission: Der Erfolg von M2M ("machine-to-machine"​) und IoT ("internet-of-things"​) Anwendungen wird erst durch eine projektspezifische Implementierung der benötigten M2M Hardware und Software Komponenten ermöglicht. Standard-Lösungen sind meistens entweder nicht verfügbar oder bieten nur sehr eingeschränkte Funktionalität. Um der Anforderung nach maßgeschneiderten M2M Lösungen Rechnung zu tragen wentwickeln wir für Industriekunden sowie M2M Anbietern basierend auf unseren eigenen Technologieplattformen für die jeweilige Anwendung optimierte Telematik-Produkte. Unsere Vision ist es dabei, mittels unserer Kompetenz in einer Vielzahl von relevanten Technologien unseren Kunden zu einer erfolgreichen Umsetzung ihrer M2M Ziele zu verhelfen, und somit einen Beitrag zur Weiterentwicklung des M2M Markts zu leisten. Unsere Mission ist dabei, mit Hilfe unseres Technologie-Plattform-Ansatzes schnell und günstig entsprechende Lösungen liefern zu können, damit Kosten & Ihr Zeitplan kalkulierbar bleiben

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 159
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

T-Mobile

12920 SE 38th St, None, Bellevue, WA, US, 98006
Last Update: 2025-07-25 (UTC)
Between 600 and 649

T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) is America’s supercharged Un-carrier, delivering an advanced 4G LTE and transformative nationwide 5G network that will offer reliable connectivity for all. T-Mobile’s customers benefit from its unmatched combination of value and quality, unwavering obsession with offering them the best possible service experience and undisputable drive for disruption that creates competition and innovation in wireless and beyond. Based in Bellevue, Wash., T-Mobile provides services through its subsidiaries and operates its flagship brands, T-Mobile and Metro by T-Mobile. For more information, please visit: https://www.t-mobile.com.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 89,656
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
17
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cetec.jpeg
CeTEC GmbH & Co KG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/t-mobile.jpeg
T-Mobile
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CeTEC GmbH & Co KG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
T-Mobile
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CeTEC GmbH & Co KG in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

T-Mobile has 308.16% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — CeTEC GmbH & Co KG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CeTEC GmbH & Co KG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — T-Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cetec.jpeg
CeTEC GmbH & Co KG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/t-mobile.jpeg
T-Mobile
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Passive Eavesdropping, Unencrypted Satellite Transmissions, Lack of Signal Encryption
Motivation: Academic Research, Security Awareness, Vulnerability Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Industry Pushback Against Regulation, Compliance Cost Concerns
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Routing Infrastructure
Motivation: Surveillance, Espionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to T-Mobile company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

T-Mobile company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company has not reported any.

In the current year, T-Mobile company has reported more cyber incidents than CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company.

Neither T-Mobile company nor CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

T-Mobile company has disclosed at least one data breach, while CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

T-Mobile company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

T-Mobile company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor T-Mobile holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

T-Mobile company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company.

T-Mobile company employs more people globally than CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor T-Mobile holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor T-Mobile holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor T-Mobile holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor T-Mobile holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor T-Mobile holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor T-Mobile holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sakai is a Collaboration and Learning Environment. Prior to versions 23.5 and 25.0, EncryptionUtilityServiceImpl initialized an AES256TextEncryptor password (serverSecretKey) using RandomStringUtils with the default java.util.Random. java.util.Random is a non‑cryptographic PRNG and can be predicted from limited state/seed information (e.g., start time window), substantially reducing the effective search space of the generated key. An attacker who can obtain ciphertexts (e.g., exported or at‑rest strings protected by this service) and approximate the PRNG seed can feasibly reconstruct the serverSecretKey and decrypt affected data. SAK-49866 is patched in Sakai 23.5, 25.0, and trunk.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to large memory usage. This requires parsing the content stream of a page using the LZWDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires parsing the content stream of a page which has an inline image using the DCTDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.5, Authlib’s JWE zip=DEF path performs unbounded DEFLATE decompression. A very small ciphertext can expand into tens or hundreds of megabytes on decrypt, allowing an attacker who can supply decryptable tokens to exhaust memory and CPU and cause denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.5. Workarounds for this issue involve rejecting or stripping zip=DEF for inbound JWEs at the application boundary, forking and add a bounded decompression guard via decompressobj().decompress(data, MAX_SIZE)) and returning an error when output exceeds a safe limit, or enforcing strict maximum token sizes and fail fast on oversized inputs; combine with rate limiting.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.4.2, OpenBao's audit log did not appropriately redact fields when relevant subsystems sent []byte response parameters rather than strings. This includes, but is not limited to sys/raw with use of encoding=base64, all data would be emitted unredacted to the audit log, and Transit, when performing a signing operation with a derived Ed25519 key, would emit public keys to the audit log. This issue has been patched in OpenBao 2.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X