Comparison Overview

CeTEC GmbH & Co KG

VS

MTNL

CeTEC GmbH & Co KG

Raiffeisenallee 12b, Oberhaching bei München, Bayern, 82041, DE
Last Update: 2025-03-19 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Unser Unternehmen: Die CeTEC ist ein hoch spezialisiertes Projekthaus für Telemetrie-, Telematik- und Off-board-Navigationssysteme mit Sitz im Süden von München, sowie Büros in Rosenheim und Breslau/Polen. Wir entwickeln Hard- und Software für Komplettsysteme, Anwendungen und extrem miniaturisierte Endgeräte. Dazu bedienen wir uns modernster Mobilfunk- und Satelliten-Technologie. Unser Leistungsspektrum erstreckt sich vom Prototypenbau über Kleinstserien für Spezialanwendungen bis hin zur Entwicklung und Serienfertigung für komplette Sicherheits-, Ortungs-, Kommunikations- und Telemedizinsysteme. Wir entwickeln die komplette Hard- und Software für unsere Produkte bei uns im Hause. Als Spezialisten für anspruchsvolle Technologie-Projekte genießen wir national wie international einen ausgezeichneten Ruf in unserer Branche. Vision & Mission: Der Erfolg von M2M ("machine-to-machine"​) und IoT ("internet-of-things"​) Anwendungen wird erst durch eine projektspezifische Implementierung der benötigten M2M Hardware und Software Komponenten ermöglicht. Standard-Lösungen sind meistens entweder nicht verfügbar oder bieten nur sehr eingeschränkte Funktionalität. Um der Anforderung nach maßgeschneiderten M2M Lösungen Rechnung zu tragen wentwickeln wir für Industriekunden sowie M2M Anbietern basierend auf unseren eigenen Technologieplattformen für die jeweilige Anwendung optimierte Telematik-Produkte. Unsere Vision ist es dabei, mittels unserer Kompetenz in einer Vielzahl von relevanten Technologien unseren Kunden zu einer erfolgreichen Umsetzung ihrer M2M Ziele zu verhelfen, und somit einen Beitrag zur Weiterentwicklung des M2M Markts zu leisten. Unsere Mission ist dabei, mit Hilfe unseres Technologie-Plattform-Ansatzes schnell und günstig entsprechende Lösungen liefern zu können, damit Kosten & Ihr Zeitplan kalkulierbar bleiben

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 159
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MTNL

Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

MTNL was set up on 1st April, 1986 by the Government of India to upgrade the quality of telecom services, expand the telecom network, introduce new services and to raise revenue for telecom development needs of India's key metros . Delhi, the political capital and Mumbai, the business capital of India. In the past 23 years, the company has taken rapid strides to emerge as India's leading and one of Asia's largest telecom operating companies. Besides having a strong financial base, MTNL has achieved a customer base of 8.06 million as on 31st March 2009. The company has also been in the forefront of technology induction by converting 100% of its telephone exchange network into the state-of-the-art digital mode. The Govt. of India currently holds 56.25% stake in the company.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cetec.jpeg
CeTEC GmbH & Co KG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mtnl.jpeg
MTNL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CeTEC GmbH & Co KG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MTNL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CeTEC GmbH & Co KG in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MTNL in 2025.

Incident History — CeTEC GmbH & Co KG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CeTEC GmbH & Co KG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MTNL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MTNL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cetec.jpeg
CeTEC GmbH & Co KG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mtnl.jpeg
MTNL
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MTNL company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MTNL company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company.

In the current year, MTNL company and CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MTNL company nor CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MTNL company nor CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MTNL company nor CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company nor MTNL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor MTNL holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company nor MTNL company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CeTEC GmbH & Co KG company employs more people globally than MTNL company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor MTNL holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor MTNL holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor MTNL holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor MTNL holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor MTNL holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CeTEC GmbH & Co KG nor MTNL holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sakai is a Collaboration and Learning Environment. Prior to versions 23.5 and 25.0, EncryptionUtilityServiceImpl initialized an AES256TextEncryptor password (serverSecretKey) using RandomStringUtils with the default java.util.Random. java.util.Random is a non‑cryptographic PRNG and can be predicted from limited state/seed information (e.g., start time window), substantially reducing the effective search space of the generated key. An attacker who can obtain ciphertexts (e.g., exported or at‑rest strings protected by this service) and approximate the PRNG seed can feasibly reconstruct the serverSecretKey and decrypt affected data. SAK-49866 is patched in Sakai 23.5, 25.0, and trunk.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to large memory usage. This requires parsing the content stream of a page using the LZWDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires parsing the content stream of a page which has an inline image using the DCTDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.5, Authlib’s JWE zip=DEF path performs unbounded DEFLATE decompression. A very small ciphertext can expand into tens or hundreds of megabytes on decrypt, allowing an attacker who can supply decryptable tokens to exhaust memory and CPU and cause denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.5. Workarounds for this issue involve rejecting or stripping zip=DEF for inbound JWEs at the application boundary, forking and add a bounded decompression guard via decompressobj().decompress(data, MAX_SIZE)) and returning an error when output exceeds a safe limit, or enforcing strict maximum token sizes and fail fast on oversized inputs; combine with rate limiting.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.4.2, OpenBao's audit log did not appropriately redact fields when relevant subsystems sent []byte response parameters rather than strings. This includes, but is not limited to sys/raw with use of encoding=base64, all data would be emitted unredacted to the audit log, and Transit, when performing a signing operation with a derived Ed25519 key, would emit public keys to the audit log. This issue has been patched in OpenBao 2.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X