Comparison Overview

Ceptagon

VS

Mimo Monitors

Ceptagon

Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Designed, Engineered, & Manufactured in the United States of America. How many computer case manufacturers can say that? We do! ​Solutions for everyday desktop computer problems are coming your way from Ceptagon. We ensure our products are designed to the highest standards using our prior experience from designing high amperage industrial electrical equipment and electrical enclosures. We are devoted to manufacturing better products using advanced technologies, materials, and processes. Our manufacturing partners have a combined 40+ years of manufacturing experience. ​Innovation begins with an idea. This idea came from how we wanted to use our computers in 2008. Now it is 2018, and no one has touched the idea. It is time to create the world of PC's we want to live in.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mimo Monitors

14048 W Petronella Dr., Libertyville, IL, 60048, US
Last Update: 2025-11-19
Between 750 and 799

Mimo Monitors, established in 2008, is a global expert and industry leader in small touchscreen monitors, displays, and tablets. Designed with a solutions-first approach, we believe in creating small footprint and high value displays that drive innovation and provide a seamless experience for digital signage, conference rooms, kiosks, point of purchase, point of sale, hospitality, retail, and more. Centered in providing touchscreens with human touch, we put customer service first, offering personalized, direct communication and detail-oriented service to ensure client satisfaction. Focused on flexible and customizable solutions that are designed to fit the need, our touchscreens are intuitive to use, easy to deploy, and sleek in design, all while enhancing productivity and user experience. Our world-class team has deployed Mimo Monitors solutions in locations throughout the world for Fortune 500 and leading brands such as Google, Logitech, Verifone, Hertz, John Deere, Four Winds Interactive and more. Our proprietary, cutting-edge small touchscreen solutions in tandem with our flexibility and superior customer service is what makes us the most trusted touchscreen monitor provider around the world.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceptagon.jpeg
Ceptagon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mimo-monitors.jpeg
Mimo Monitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ceptagon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mimo Monitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ceptagon in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mimo Monitors in 2025.

Incident History — Ceptagon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ceptagon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mimo Monitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mimo Monitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceptagon.jpeg
Ceptagon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mimo-monitors.jpeg
Mimo Monitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ceptagon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mimo Monitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mimo Monitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ceptagon company.

In the current year, Mimo Monitors company and Ceptagon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mimo Monitors company nor Ceptagon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mimo Monitors company nor Ceptagon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mimo Monitors company nor Ceptagon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ceptagon company nor Mimo Monitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ceptagon nor Mimo Monitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ceptagon company nor Mimo Monitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mimo Monitors company employs more people globally than Ceptagon company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Ceptagon nor Mimo Monitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ceptagon nor Mimo Monitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ceptagon nor Mimo Monitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ceptagon nor Mimo Monitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ceptagon nor Mimo Monitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ceptagon nor Mimo Monitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H