Comparison Overview

Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU)

VS

Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology

Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU)

SSS-1 Building, New Delhi, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The Centre for Studies in Science Policy (CSSP) as an interdisciplinary teaching and research programme is the only one of its kind in the Indian university system. Designed as a combined teaching and research effort, the CSSP aims at exploring various dimensions of the science-technology-society interface. While centrally oriented as an academic programme, the CSSP also directs its research agendas at questions and challenges that are relevant to contemporary policy concerns. The Centre also aims at undertaking research assignments on science, technology and innovation policies and related areas such as university – industry relations; intellectual property rights; gender relations in science and technology; globalisation of innovation and internationalisation of R&D; technology and environment; scientists in organisations; and technology futures studies. http://www.jnu.ac.in/SSS/CSSP/

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology

undefined, undefined, undefined, 30332-0620, US
Last Update: 2025-11-18
Between 700 and 749

Our core competency in advanced communications technology and our reputation as an international, national, regional and state resource has made us a go-to entity. CACP operates as a neutral authority, monitoring and assessing related legislative and regulatory issues, identifying future options through horizon scanning techniques, and promotes a clearer understanding of the ever changing technology landscape.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-studies-in-science-policy-jnu.jpeg
Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-advanced-communications-policy-georgia-institute-of-technology.jpeg
Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology in 2025.

Incident History — Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-studies-in-science-policy-jnu.jpeg
Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-advanced-communications-policy-georgia-institute-of-technology.jpeg
Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) company.

In the current year, Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company and Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company nor Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company nor Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company nor Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) company nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) company nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) company employs more people globally than Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (CSSP-JNU) nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H