Comparison Overview

The Centre for Social Justice

VS

Department of Sport and Recreation

The Centre for Social Justice

Kings Buildings, 16 Smith Square, London, London, SW1P 3HQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The Centre for Social Justice is an independent think tank which seeks to put social justice at the heart of British society, and to build an alliance of poverty-fighting organisations to see a reversal of social breakdown in Britain. We conduct policy research that combines data, anecdotal evidence and polling. Through this we seek to gain an accurate picture of poverty in Britain, its causes and consequences, and to define the role of the state, voluntary and private sectors in its reduction. All our policy research is published on our website free of charge: www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk In addition, the CSJ highlights the work of profoundly differing and unique small voluntary organisations and charities in the prevention and/or relief of poverty. These groups provide welfare in the most damaged parts of British society. We champion their local, voluntary and effective work through building an Alliance of poverty fighting organisations to ensure this valuable insights and experience are taken on board by policy makers. Further to this, our annual Awards programme highlights this important work and rewards cash prizes of up to £10,000 to those which are having the greatest impact in The Centre is funded entirely by private donations and grants from charitable trusts with opportunities for corporate sponsorship available. We do not receive funds from the government nor political parties.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Department of Sport and Recreation

246 Vincent Street, Leederville, WA, 6007, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Sport and Recreation (WA), a division of the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries is the lead agency responsible for the implementation of government policy and initiatives in sport and recreation. Previous to 1 July 2017 we were the Department of Sport and Recreation and we will continue to work closely with the sport and recreation industry as we have always done and maintain the same high standard of service we have always delivered.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 587
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/department-of-sport-and-recreation.jpeg
Department of Sport and Recreation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Centre for Social Justice
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Department of Sport and Recreation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Centre for Social Justice in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Sport and Recreation in 2025.

Incident History — The Centre for Social Justice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Centre for Social Justice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Department of Sport and Recreation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Sport and Recreation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-social-justice.jpeg
The Centre for Social Justice
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/department-of-sport-and-recreation.jpeg
Department of Sport and Recreation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Department of Sport and Recreation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Centre for Social Justice company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Department of Sport and Recreation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Centre for Social Justice company.

In the current year, Department of Sport and Recreation company and The Centre for Social Justice company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Department of Sport and Recreation company nor The Centre for Social Justice company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Department of Sport and Recreation company nor The Centre for Social Justice company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Department of Sport and Recreation company nor The Centre for Social Justice company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Centre for Social Justice company nor Department of Sport and Recreation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Centre for Social Justice nor Department of Sport and Recreation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Centre for Social Justice company nor Department of Sport and Recreation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Department of Sport and Recreation company employs more people globally than The Centre for Social Justice company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The Centre for Social Justice nor Department of Sport and Recreation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Centre for Social Justice nor Department of Sport and Recreation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Centre for Social Justice nor Department of Sport and Recreation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Centre for Social Justice nor Department of Sport and Recreation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Centre for Social Justice nor Department of Sport and Recreation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Centre for Social Justice nor Department of Sport and Recreation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H