Comparison Overview

Centre for Recovering Families

VS

Fit Mind Cleveland

Centre for Recovering Families

110 gough st., San Francisco, CA 94107, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://recoveringFamilies.com

We are a team of dedicated professionals committed to enhancing the well being of individuals and families in recovery by providing quality outpatient counseling, education, and support in an atmosphere of care and respect. Our services are based on three fundamental beliefs: • That addiction is a family disease. • That family recovery is important to the successful outcome of long-term sustained recovery and change for the addicted person • That each individual family member deserves to be healthy, emotionally, spiritually, and mentally, whether the addicted person stays addiction free or not. Through counseling, education and support, we help our clients to take charge of their situation, find the solutions to their problems, and set healthy boundaries so that they can have the peace and serenity they are seeking.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fit Mind Cleveland

20525 Center Ridge Rd St 520, Rocky River, Ohio, 44116, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fitmindcleveland.com

Fit Mind Cleveland was opened in September 2010 in Rocky River. The partners of Fit Mind Cleveland are Sarah Della Vella, LISW and Abbey Samide, PCC-S. Sarah and Abbey each have over 10 years experience in providing individual, group, family, and couples therapy, in addition to life coaching services. They serve all ages and take most insurance. They work with the full spectrum of mental health issues, from simple adjustment/grief/anxiety to serious mental health issues including personality and mood disorders.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-recovering-families.jpeg
Centre for Recovering Families
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fit-mind-cleveland.jpeg
Fit Mind Cleveland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Centre for Recovering Families
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fit Mind Cleveland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre for Recovering Families in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fit Mind Cleveland in 2026.

Incident History — Centre for Recovering Families (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre for Recovering Families cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fit Mind Cleveland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fit Mind Cleveland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-recovering-families.jpeg
Centre for Recovering Families
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fit-mind-cleveland.jpeg
Fit Mind Cleveland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Centre for Recovering Families company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fit Mind Cleveland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fit Mind Cleveland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Centre for Recovering Families company.

In the current year, Fit Mind Cleveland company and Centre for Recovering Families company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fit Mind Cleveland company nor Centre for Recovering Families company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fit Mind Cleveland company nor Centre for Recovering Families company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fit Mind Cleveland company nor Centre for Recovering Families company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Centre for Recovering Families company nor Fit Mind Cleveland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Centre for Recovering Families nor Fit Mind Cleveland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Centre for Recovering Families company nor Fit Mind Cleveland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fit Mind Cleveland company employs more people globally than Centre for Recovering Families company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Centre for Recovering Families nor Fit Mind Cleveland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Centre for Recovering Families nor Fit Mind Cleveland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Centre for Recovering Families nor Fit Mind Cleveland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Centre for Recovering Families nor Fit Mind Cleveland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Centre for Recovering Families nor Fit Mind Cleveland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Centre for Recovering Families nor Fit Mind Cleveland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References