Comparison Overview

Centre for Corporate Public Affairs

VS

Tourism & Transport Forum

Centre for Corporate Public Affairs

95 Pitt St, Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Since its establishment in 1990, the Centre for Corporate Public Affairs has been working to provide our members with intellectual leadership, research and practical resources to advance and cement the role public affairs performs within leading organisations. It is the only organisation of its type in the Asia Pacific region to support, advance and research corporate public affairs as a management function, encompassing government, media and stakeholder relations, corporate social responsibility/corporate citizenship, issues management, internal communications and reputation management. We create platforms for mutual exchange within the profession's leadership, excellent professional development programs and information resources that provide senior executives and line managers with the theory and tools to develop their skills and knowledge of the discipline at a local and international level. The Centre has been acknowledged internationally as a thought leader by business leaders, academics and professionals working in the field of corporate public affairs.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tourism & Transport Forum

31 Market St, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Tourism & Transport Forum (TTF) is the national peak advocacy body for the tourism, transport and aviation sectors. It is a CEO forum representing the interests of leading Australian institutions and corporations in the private and public sectors. TTF uses its experience and networks to influence public policy outcomes and business practices and to assist the delivery of major tourism, aviation and transport-related infrastructure projects. Our members’ interests include tourism, major events, aviation, investment, hotel, property development, land and maritime transport, finance, retail, hospitality and education.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-corporate-public-affairs.jpeg
Centre for Corporate Public Affairs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tourism-&-transport-forum.jpeg
Tourism & Transport Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Centre for Corporate Public Affairs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tourism & Transport Forum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre for Corporate Public Affairs in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tourism & Transport Forum in 2025.

Incident History — Centre for Corporate Public Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre for Corporate Public Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tourism & Transport Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tourism & Transport Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-corporate-public-affairs.jpeg
Centre for Corporate Public Affairs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tourism-&-transport-forum.jpeg
Tourism & Transport Forum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Centre for Corporate Public Affairs company and Tourism & Transport Forum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Tourism & Transport Forum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Centre for Corporate Public Affairs company.

In the current year, Tourism & Transport Forum company and Centre for Corporate Public Affairs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tourism & Transport Forum company nor Centre for Corporate Public Affairs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tourism & Transport Forum company nor Centre for Corporate Public Affairs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tourism & Transport Forum company nor Centre for Corporate Public Affairs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Centre for Corporate Public Affairs company nor Tourism & Transport Forum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Centre for Corporate Public Affairs nor Tourism & Transport Forum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Centre for Corporate Public Affairs company nor Tourism & Transport Forum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tourism & Transport Forum company employs more people globally than Centre for Corporate Public Affairs company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Centre for Corporate Public Affairs nor Tourism & Transport Forum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Centre for Corporate Public Affairs nor Tourism & Transport Forum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Centre for Corporate Public Affairs nor Tourism & Transport Forum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Centre for Corporate Public Affairs nor Tourism & Transport Forum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Centre for Corporate Public Affairs nor Tourism & Transport Forum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Centre for Corporate Public Affairs nor Tourism & Transport Forum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H