Comparison Overview

Centre for Contemporary Arts

VS

Old Dillard Museum

Centre for Contemporary Arts

350 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, undefined, G2 3JD, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cca-glasgow.com

CCA is a not-for-profit, multi-purpose, centre for contemporary art and culture located in the city centre of Glasgow. We curate thought-provoking, often experimental work and provide a platform for a collaborative, civic-led programme, all of which serves as a catalyst for new ways of thinking and active engagement. We host a programme of exhibitions, events, films, music, literature, workshops, festivals and performances - working collaboratively with more than 200 programme partners every year. At the core of all activities is the desire to work with artists, develop relationships with communities across the city and beyond, commission new work and provide a welcoming and accessible space for the widest possible audience to enjoy art and culture. Across all these activities, and our building, we are actively working towards integrating sustainable practices.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Old Dillard Museum

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.broward.k12.fl.us/olddillardmuseum/

The Old Dillard Museum occupies a prominent place in the history of Fort Lauderdale. Formerly called “the colored school," the building is one of Ft. Lauderdale’s first local historic landmarks, as well as the first school constructed for people of color in this area. Since its construction, this landmark has served as an important educational and cultural center for Ft. Lauderdale’s African‐American community. Regarded by all as one of Broward County’s most significant links to the past, this historically distinctive structure has been restored to serve the community as a museum and cultural/educational center.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-contemporary-arts.jpeg
Centre for Contemporary Arts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-dillard-museum.jpeg
Old Dillard Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Centre for Contemporary Arts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Old Dillard Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre for Contemporary Arts in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Dillard Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Centre for Contemporary Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre for Contemporary Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Old Dillard Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Dillard Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-contemporary-arts.jpeg
Centre for Contemporary Arts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-dillard-museum.jpeg
Old Dillard Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Old Dillard Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Centre for Contemporary Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Old Dillard Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Centre for Contemporary Arts company.

In the current year, Old Dillard Museum company and Centre for Contemporary Arts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Old Dillard Museum company nor Centre for Contemporary Arts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Old Dillard Museum company nor Centre for Contemporary Arts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Old Dillard Museum company nor Centre for Contemporary Arts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Centre for Contemporary Arts company nor Old Dillard Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Centre for Contemporary Arts nor Old Dillard Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Centre for Contemporary Arts company nor Old Dillard Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Old Dillard Museum company employs more people globally than Centre for Contemporary Arts company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Centre for Contemporary Arts nor Old Dillard Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Centre for Contemporary Arts nor Old Dillard Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Centre for Contemporary Arts nor Old Dillard Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Centre for Contemporary Arts nor Old Dillard Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Centre for Contemporary Arts nor Old Dillard Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Centre for Contemporary Arts nor Old Dillard Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References