Comparison Overview

Central Screw Products

VS

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.

Central Screw Products

1070 Maplelawn Dr, Troy, MI, 48234, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.centralscrewproducts.com

Central Screw Products is a company with a deep history in manufacturing, starting more than 95 years ago. We’ve created our own unique recipe for how we operate day to day. This recipe has allowed us to focus our efforts on our customer needs and simplify the workflow areas. We are more than just another machine shop. CSP leverages the latest in robotics and automation technology to achieve one of the machining industry’s most efficient engineering to production ratios. The result is mastery and control of the manufacturing process, maximum customer value, and unparalleled quality.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.

210 Marketridge, Ridgeland, MS, 392157, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wardmech.com

Ward Mechanical is a company that values the highest level of service for our customers and the lines that we represent. Started in Mississippi in 1965, the same core values that the company was founded upon then, still exist today. With a unique combination of the finest manufacturers and a knowledgeable and motivated staff, Ward Mechanical Equipment stands out for our service and integrity. Extensive inventories and quick deliveries ensure customer satisfaction. Our mission is to be the preferred supplier of HVAC products to our customers in the State of Mississipi by providing quality products, engineering and design expertise and superior customer service.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-screw-products.jpeg
Central Screw Products
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ward-mechanical.jpeg
Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Central Screw Products
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central Screw Products in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Central Screw Products (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Central Screw Products cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-screw-products.jpeg
Central Screw Products
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ward-mechanical.jpeg
Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Central Screw Products company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Central Screw Products company.

In the current year, Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company and Central Screw Products company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company nor Central Screw Products company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company nor Central Screw Products company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company nor Central Screw Products company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Central Screw Products company nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Central Screw Products nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Central Screw Products company nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company employs more people globally than Central Screw Products company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Central Screw Products nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Central Screw Products nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Central Screw Products nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Central Screw Products nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Central Screw Products nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Central Screw Products nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References