Comparison Overview

Central New York Library Resources Council

VS

Texas State Library and Archives Commission

Central New York Library Resources Council

5710 Commons Park Drive, East Syracuse, New York, 13057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.clrc.org

The Central New York Library Resources Council, familiarly known as CLRC, was formed in 1967 as one of nine Reference and Research Library Resources councils ("3Rs"​) in New York State. CLRC serves libraries and library systems in four Central New York counties: Herkimer, Madison, Oneida, and Onondaga. CLRC members share in the benefits of Council programs and services which are approved by a Board of Trustees elected by the Council membership. Advice and planning assistance are given by CLRC members serving on Standing and Program Committees. CLRC member institutions pay dues and actively participate in Council services including support for database building, access to regional resources, interlibrary loan, and delivery of materials among libraries. Other services available include sponsorship of continuing education events, promoting legislative efforts on behalf of libraries, and communications. Members also benefit from a variety of grant programs.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Texas State Library and Archives Commission

1201 Brazos Street, Austin, TX, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tsl.texas.gov

The mission of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission is to provide Texans access to the information needed to be informed, productive citizens by preserving the archival record of Texas; enhancing the service capacity of public, academic, and school libraries; assisting public agencies in the maintenance of their records; and meeting the reading needs of Texans with disabilities.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-new-york-library-resources-council.jpeg
Central New York Library Resources Council
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-state-library-and-archives-commission.jpeg
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Central New York Library Resources Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central New York Library Resources Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas State Library and Archives Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Central New York Library Resources Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Central New York Library Resources Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Texas State Library and Archives Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas State Library and Archives Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-new-york-library-resources-council.jpeg
Central New York Library Resources Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-state-library-and-archives-commission.jpeg
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Texas State Library and Archives Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Central New York Library Resources Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Texas State Library and Archives Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Central New York Library Resources Council company.

In the current year, Texas State Library and Archives Commission company and Central New York Library Resources Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission company nor Central New York Library Resources Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission company nor Central New York Library Resources Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Texas State Library and Archives Commission company nor Central New York Library Resources Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Central New York Library Resources Council company nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Central New York Library Resources Council nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Central New York Library Resources Council company nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Texas State Library and Archives Commission company employs more people globally than Central New York Library Resources Council company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Central New York Library Resources Council nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Central New York Library Resources Council nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Central New York Library Resources Council nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Central New York Library Resources Council nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Central New York Library Resources Council nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Central New York Library Resources Council nor Texas State Library and Archives Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References