Comparison Overview

Central California Alliance for Health

VS

The University of Texas Medical Branch

Central California Alliance for Health

1600 Green Hills Road, Ste 101, None, Scotts Valley, CA, US, 95066
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.thealliance.health

Central California Alliance for Health (the Alliance) is an award-winning regional Medi-Cal managed care plan that provides health insurance for children, adults, seniors and people with disabilities in Mariposa, Merced, Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz counties. We currently serve more than 442,000 members. Founded in 1996, the Alliance was established to improve access to health care for lower income residents. We have pursued this mission by linking members to primary care physicians and clinics who assist in managing their care. Our vision is: Healthy People. Healthy Communities. That vision remains at the forefront of the work we do every day. Come join our team!

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 543
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

The University of Texas Medical Branch

301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas, 77550, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799
http://utmb.jobs

ABOUT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH: Texas' first academic health center opened its doors in 1891 and today has four campuses, five health sciences schools, six institutes for advanced study, a research enterprise that includes one of only two national laboratories dedicated to the safe study of infectious threats to human health, a Level 1 Trauma Center and a health system offering a full range of primary and specialized medical services throughout the Texas Gulf Coast region. UTMB is an institution in the University of Texas System and a member of the Texas Medical Center.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,065
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-california-alliance-for-health.jpeg
Central California Alliance for Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utmb.jpeg
The University of Texas Medical Branch
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Central California Alliance for Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The University of Texas Medical Branch
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central California Alliance for Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Texas Medical Branch in 2025.

Incident History — Central California Alliance for Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Central California Alliance for Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The University of Texas Medical Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Texas Medical Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-california-alliance-for-health.jpeg
Central California Alliance for Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utmb.jpeg
The University of Texas Medical Branch
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The University of Texas Medical Branch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Central California Alliance for Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Central California Alliance for Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The University of Texas Medical Branch company has not reported any.

In the current year, The University of Texas Medical Branch company and Central California Alliance for Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch company nor Central California Alliance for Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Central California Alliance for Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The University of Texas Medical Branch company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch company nor Central California Alliance for Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Central California Alliance for Health company nor The University of Texas Medical Branch company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Central California Alliance for Health nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Central California Alliance for Health company nor The University of Texas Medical Branch company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The University of Texas Medical Branch company employs more people globally than Central California Alliance for Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Central California Alliance for Health nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Central California Alliance for Health nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Central California Alliance for Health nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Central California Alliance for Health nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Central California Alliance for Health nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Central California Alliance for Health nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References