Comparison Overview

CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC

VS

Go To Court Lawyers

CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC

2624 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, 98102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

CenterPoint Aviation Law represents and counsels clients through the process of purchasing, selling, owning and operating an aircraft, and advising on the corresponding tax, regulatory, and management impacts that arise from aircraft ownership and operations. CenterPoint Aviation Law counsels clients through the entire life cycle of aircraft ownership. Our services include entity formation and structuring, minimization of the corresponding federal and state tax liabilities, including depreciation and personal use limitations, 1031 like-kind exchanges, federal excise taxes, as well as state sales, use and property taxes, all while maintaining compliance with the Federal Aviation Regulations. We also assist clients in state or local tax controversies by providing support through the audit and state administrative appeals process. We also assist clients with other aviation related issues including FAA and International Registration, ownership trusts, aircraft management, charter, and joint ownership arrangements.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Go To Court Lawyers

7/320 Adelaide Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Go To Court's team works closely with hundreds of solicitors across the country who have been selected to join the gotocourt.com.au network on the basis of their experience and local knowledge. The result? A powerful legal fraternity that provides affordable legal representation in Criminal, Family and Civil cases, in any court of Australia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centerpoint-aviation-law-pllc.jpeg
CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/go-to-court.jpeg
Go To Court Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Go To Court Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Go To Court Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Go To Court Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Go To Court Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centerpoint-aviation-law-pllc.jpeg
CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/go-to-court.jpeg
Go To Court Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Go To Court Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Go To Court Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC company.

In the current year, Go To Court Lawyers company and CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers company nor CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers company nor CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Go To Court Lawyers company nor CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC company nor Go To Court Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC nor Go To Court Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC company nor Go To Court Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Go To Court Lawyers company employs more people globally than CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC nor Go To Court Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC nor Go To Court Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC nor Go To Court Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC nor Go To Court Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC nor Go To Court Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CenterPoint Aviation Law PLLC nor Go To Court Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X