Comparison Overview

Center On Policy Initiatives

VS

dandolopartners

Center On Policy Initiatives

3727 Camino del Rio South, San Diego, CA, 92108, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

The Center on Policy Initiatives is an independent nonprofit that has been at the forefront of the fight for economic justice since 1997. We are the San Diego County people’s think tank. We conduct research, generate policy solutions, advance leadership development, and build alliances to win policies that benefit working families and diverse communities. For more info visit: wwwcpisandiego.org/

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

dandolopartners

Level 1, 155 Queen Street, Melbourne, Victoria, AU, 3000
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

dandolopartners specialises in providing governments and private sector companies working with government with the information, insight and innovative advice required to make better decisions and more targeted investments. Our people have worked in both the private and public sectors. We understand the operations, issues and imperatives that drive government and we translate and apply this knowledge to our work for the private sector. We have earned a reputation for providing highly practical, actionable, and insightful information and advice that makes a difference to our clients around Australia.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-on-policy-initiatives.jpeg
Center On Policy Initiatives
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dandolopartners.jpeg
dandolopartners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center On Policy Initiatives
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
dandolopartners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center On Policy Initiatives in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dandolopartners in 2025.

Incident History — Center On Policy Initiatives (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center On Policy Initiatives cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — dandolopartners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dandolopartners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-on-policy-initiatives.jpeg
Center On Policy Initiatives
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dandolopartners.jpeg
dandolopartners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Center On Policy Initiatives company and dandolopartners company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, dandolopartners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center On Policy Initiatives company.

In the current year, dandolopartners company and Center On Policy Initiatives company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither dandolopartners company nor Center On Policy Initiatives company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither dandolopartners company nor Center On Policy Initiatives company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither dandolopartners company nor Center On Policy Initiatives company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center On Policy Initiatives company nor dandolopartners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center On Policy Initiatives nor dandolopartners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center On Policy Initiatives company nor dandolopartners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

dandolopartners company employs more people globally than Center On Policy Initiatives company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Center On Policy Initiatives nor dandolopartners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center On Policy Initiatives nor dandolopartners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center On Policy Initiatives nor dandolopartners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center On Policy Initiatives nor dandolopartners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center On Policy Initiatives nor dandolopartners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center On Policy Initiatives nor dandolopartners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H