Comparison Overview

Center for Science in the Public Interest

VS

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)

Center for Science in the Public Interest

1250 I Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cspinet.org

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is a non-profit health-advocacy group based in Washington, DC, that focuses on nutrition and food safety. CSPI publishes Nutrition Action, one of the nation’s largest circulation health newsletter, and has led efforts that resulted in healthier diets, more-nutritious school foods, safer foods, and more honest food labeling. CSPI provides objective information to the public and represents citizens’ interests before legislative, regulatory, and judicial bodies. CSPI is supported largely by subscribers to Nutrition Action, individual donors, and foundation grants.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)

Level 15, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749
http://www.aemc.gov.au

The Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) provides advice to governments on energy market development and is the rule maker for Australian electricity and gas markets. We take a long-term view of what needs to be done to assure consumers of reliable, secure, electricity and gas services at the best price. The National Electricity Rules, National Gas Rules and Retail Energy Rules impact on how market participants can operate in the competitive wholesale generation and retail sectors; provide specific rights for consumers to whom energy is sold or supplied; and also govern the economic regulation of electricity transmission and distribution services – the ‘poles and wires’ – and gas pipelines. Stakeholder concerns are at the heart of our work. Our stakeholders help shape our thinking and provide valuable input to our rule making and advice to governments.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 136
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-science-in-the-public-interest.jpeg
Center for Science in the Public Interest
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-energy-market-commission.jpeg
Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Science in the Public Interest
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Science in the Public Interest in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Science in the Public Interest (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Science in the Public Interest cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-science-in-the-public-interest.jpeg
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-energy-market-commission.jpeg
Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Science in the Public Interest company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Science in the Public Interest company.

In the current year, Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company and Center for Science in the Public Interest company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company nor Center for Science in the Public Interest company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company nor Center for Science in the Public Interest company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company nor Center for Science in the Public Interest company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest company nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest company nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) company employs more people globally than Center for Science in the Public Interest company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest nor Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References