Comparison Overview

Center for Responsible Lending

VS

ERVET Spa

Center for Responsible Lending

302 West Main Street, None, Durham, NC, US, 27701
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) is a non-partisan research and policy group working to ensure our nation's consumer finance system promotes and protects homeownership and family wealth. Our focus is on consumer lending: primarily mortgages, payday loans, credit cards, bank overdrafts, and auto loans. We provide research and technical policy expertise to help policymakers evaluate consumer protection options and wealth-building opportunities. We educate consumers and the media about predatory lending issues, work with local and national coalitions to push for change, and take part in selected legal cases to advance consumer protections. CRL is an affiliate of Self-Help, one of the nation's largest nonprofit community development lenders. We have offices in Durham, NC; Washington, DC; and Oakland, CA. CRL's website: www.responsiblelending.org Twitter: @CRLONLINE Facebook: www.facebook.com/CenterforResponsibleLending **2012 Winner: MacArthur Award for Creative and Effective Institutions**

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ERVET Spa

Via Morgagni, 6, Bologna, Italy, IT, 40122
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

ERVET is the Territorial Development Agency of Emilia-Romagna Region. It aim is promoting a sustainable economy, in line with the scheduling and planning of the regional authority and the system of local institutions. ERVET offers services as a centre of competence and technical support for local policies, and on the other as a subject involved in the governance of complex projects and implementer of national and international networks. The new mission and areas of action hinge upon four fundamental strategic areas: * Operative and technical support in the definition, management, monitoring and evaluation of public policies * Implementation of targeted technical action within the area of territorial development policies * Activation and development of partnerships and relational networks on local, national and international levels, with attention to public-private partnerships * Production of feasibility studies, socio-economic and operative analyses in local and sectorial areas with the aims of policy advice

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-responsible-lending.jpeg
Center for Responsible Lending
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ervet-spa.jpeg
ERVET Spa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Responsible Lending
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ERVET Spa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Responsible Lending in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ERVET Spa in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Responsible Lending (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Responsible Lending cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ERVET Spa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ERVET Spa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-responsible-lending.jpeg
Center for Responsible Lending
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ervet-spa.jpeg
ERVET Spa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Responsible Lending company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ERVET Spa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ERVET Spa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Responsible Lending company.

In the current year, ERVET Spa company and Center for Responsible Lending company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ERVET Spa company nor Center for Responsible Lending company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ERVET Spa company nor Center for Responsible Lending company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ERVET Spa company nor Center for Responsible Lending company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Responsible Lending company nor ERVET Spa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Responsible Lending nor ERVET Spa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Responsible Lending company nor ERVET Spa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Responsible Lending company employs more people globally than ERVET Spa company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Center for Responsible Lending nor ERVET Spa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Responsible Lending nor ERVET Spa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Responsible Lending nor ERVET Spa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Responsible Lending nor ERVET Spa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Responsible Lending nor ERVET Spa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Responsible Lending nor ERVET Spa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H