Comparison Overview

Center for Maine Contemporary Art

VS

DC History Center

Center for Maine Contemporary Art

21 Winter Street, Rockland, Maine, 04841, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1952, the Center for Maine Contemporary Art (CMCA) is a contemporary arts institution, presenting a year-round program of changing exhibitions featuring the work of emerging and established artists with ties to Maine. In addition, CMCA offers a full range of educational programs for all ages, including gallery talks, performances, film screenings, and hands-on workshops. In summer 2016, CMCA will open a newly constructed 11,500+ square foot building, with 5,500 square feet of exhibition space, designed by architect Toshiko Mori. Located in downtown Rockland, Maine, across from the Farnsworth Art Museum and adjacent to the Strand Theatre, the new CMCA has three exhibition galleries, a gift shop, a lecture hall, an ArtLab classroom, and an open public courtyard.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DC History Center

801 K Street NW, Washington, DC, 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The DC History Center is a 501(c)(3) community-supported educational non-profit and research organization that deepens understanding of our city’s past to connect, empower, and inspire. We seek to reach into all eight Wards to preserve and elevate the stories of Washington’s diverse people, neighborhoods, and institutions. We will do this work as a welcoming and inclusive community that fosters curiosity and nurtures civic engagement to strengthen our city for all.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-maine-contemporary-art.jpeg
Center for Maine Contemporary Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-washington-d-c-.jpeg
DC History Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Maine Contemporary Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DC History Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Maine Contemporary Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DC History Center in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Maine Contemporary Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Maine Contemporary Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DC History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DC History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-maine-contemporary-art.jpeg
Center for Maine Contemporary Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historical-society-of-washington-d-c-.jpeg
DC History Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Maine Contemporary Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DC History Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DC History Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Maine Contemporary Art company.

In the current year, DC History Center company and Center for Maine Contemporary Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DC History Center company nor Center for Maine Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DC History Center company nor Center for Maine Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DC History Center company nor Center for Maine Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Maine Contemporary Art company nor DC History Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Maine Contemporary Art nor DC History Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Maine Contemporary Art company nor DC History Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DC History Center company employs more people globally than Center for Maine Contemporary Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Center for Maine Contemporary Art nor DC History Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Maine Contemporary Art nor DC History Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Maine Contemporary Art nor DC History Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Maine Contemporary Art nor DC History Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Maine Contemporary Art nor DC History Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Maine Contemporary Art nor DC History Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X