Comparison Overview

Center for Health Progress

VS

Action Canada

Center for Health Progress

1245 E Colfax Ave. #202, Denver, Colorado, 80218, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Center for Health Progress, we believe our health care system should work for all Coloradans. So, we bring people together to ensure factors like race, income, and ZIP code don't determine a person's access to care and opportunity to live a healthy life. When we uncover commonsense solutions to these complex challenges, we get closer to ensuring our health care system works for everyone. Because when our neighbors are healthy, our communities prosper, and Colorado is stronger.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Action Canada

Montréal, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Action Canada is a national fellowship program for promising young Canadians. The program enhances Fellows' leadership skills, broadens their understanding of Canada and its policy choices, and builds an exceptional network of leaders for our future. If you are an emerging leader or know someone who qualifies, find out more at www.actioncanada.ca. __________ Action Canada est un programme national conçu pour les jeunes Canadiens et Canadiennes prometteurs. Le programme vise à renforcer les compétences de leadership des Fellows, enrichir leur compréhension du Canada et de ses choix en matière de politiques publiques et bâtir un réseau hors du commun de leaders pour notre avenir. Si vous êtes un ou une leader émergent(e) ou si vous connaissez quelqu’un qui correspond à ce profil et si vous voulez en savoir plus, vous trouverez plus de renseignements sur www.actioncanada.ca.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-health-progress.jpeg
Center for Health Progress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/action-canada.jpeg
Action Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Health Progress
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Action Canada
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Health Progress in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Action Canada in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Health Progress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Health Progress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Action Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Action Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-health-progress.jpeg
Center for Health Progress
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/action-canada.jpeg
Action Canada
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Center for Health Progress company and Action Canada company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Action Canada company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Health Progress company.

In the current year, Action Canada company and Center for Health Progress company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Action Canada company nor Center for Health Progress company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Action Canada company nor Center for Health Progress company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Action Canada company nor Center for Health Progress company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Health Progress company nor Action Canada company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Health Progress nor Action Canada holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Health Progress company nor Action Canada company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Action Canada company employs more people globally than Center for Health Progress company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Center for Health Progress nor Action Canada holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Health Progress nor Action Canada holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Health Progress nor Action Canada holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Health Progress nor Action Canada holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Health Progress nor Action Canada holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Health Progress nor Action Canada holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H