Comparison Overview

Center for Genetics and Society

VS

Inline Policy

Center for Genetics and Society

1936 University Avenue, Berkeley, CA, 94704, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/index.php

The social implications of new and emerging human biotechnologies are far-reaching and profound. Genetic, reproductive and biomedical technologies have the power to promote or undermine individual well-being and public health, create private fortunes or advance the public interest, and foster or threaten a just and fair society. Used appropriately, many human biotechnologies hold great potential for treating disease and alleviating suffering. But these same tools can also be abused, either deliberately, inadvertently, or because of our inattention and inaction.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Inline Policy

1-45 Durham Street, 310, London, London, GB, SE11 5JH
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
https://www.inlinepolicy.com

Inline is a pioneering political consultancy that gives clear and comprehensive political and regulatory advice. We can help you influence the right authorities so that your business can grow. Without the right guidance, innovative companies are at risk of being affected by outdated laws and hastily introduced regulations that negatively impact on their operations and growth. We have a wealth of experience in dealing with policy across a wide range of global markets, with expertise at local, national and international levels, in particular on EU matters. From our London and Brussels offices we provide monitoring and analysis to worldwide organisations and have trusted partner organisations in the markets around the globe. Our agile and flexible team is well placed to spot emerging policy and regulatory areas and take swift responsive action. We can shape regulation to help your company grow.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-genetics-and-society.jpeg
Center for Genetics and Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inlinepolicy.jpeg
Inline Policy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Genetics and Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inline Policy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Genetics and Society in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inline Policy in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Genetics and Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Genetics and Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inline Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inline Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-genetics-and-society.jpeg
Center for Genetics and Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inlinepolicy.jpeg
Inline Policy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Genetics and Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Inline Policy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Inline Policy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Genetics and Society company.

In the current year, Inline Policy company and Center for Genetics and Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Inline Policy company nor Center for Genetics and Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Inline Policy company nor Center for Genetics and Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inline Policy company nor Center for Genetics and Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Genetics and Society company nor Inline Policy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Genetics and Society nor Inline Policy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Genetics and Society company nor Inline Policy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Inline Policy company employs more people globally than Center for Genetics and Society company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Center for Genetics and Society nor Inline Policy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Genetics and Society nor Inline Policy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Genetics and Society nor Inline Policy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Genetics and Society nor Inline Policy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Genetics and Society nor Inline Policy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Genetics and Society nor Inline Policy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References