Comparison Overview

Center for Economic Analyses

VS

R Street Institute

Center for Economic Analyses

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Mission of CEA is to continuously research economic development and public policy in the Republic of Macedonia and to offer recommendations, suggestions and measures to the government and non-governmental institutions. CEA members share a common vision of the Republic of Macedonia as a new emerging economy integrated with regional and world markets. They devote their time, efforts and knowledge to help make this vision become a reality. : 1. To provide quality policy analyses; 2. To support viable economic policy in Macedonia; 3. To help foster an environment that brings about higher investment, accelerated development and growth of the Macedonian economy, and EU accession; 4. To achieve financial sustainability; 5. To encourage regional cooperation and collaboration in the Balkans; 6. To strengthen civil society, social capital and trust.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

R Street Institute

1411 K St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The R Street Institute (RSI) is a leading think tank focused on solving complex public policy challenges through free markets and limited, effective government. RSI consistently offers pragmatic, real solutions that foster American innovation, bolster competition, and safeguard individual liberty—all with the understanding that life in a democratic society sometimes requires compromises that don’t necessarily represent first, best solutions. While RSI’s primary audience is policymakers, influencing public policy is not always linear. Policymakers, policy experts, partner organizations, academics, media, and donors are all part of RSI’s ecosystem. Together, these different stakeholders and collaborators enable RSI to influence real public policy change. Learn more: https://www.rstreet.org/about-r-street/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-economic-analyses.jpeg
Center for Economic Analyses
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r-street-institute.jpeg
R Street Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Economic Analyses
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
R Street Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Economic Analyses in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R Street Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Economic Analyses (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Economic Analyses cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — R Street Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R Street Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-economic-analyses.jpeg
Center for Economic Analyses
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r-street-institute.jpeg
R Street Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Center for Economic Analyses company and R Street Institute company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, R Street Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Economic Analyses company.

In the current year, R Street Institute company and Center for Economic Analyses company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither R Street Institute company nor Center for Economic Analyses company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither R Street Institute company nor Center for Economic Analyses company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither R Street Institute company nor Center for Economic Analyses company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Economic Analyses company nor R Street Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Economic Analyses nor R Street Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Economic Analyses company nor R Street Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

R Street Institute company employs more people globally than Center for Economic Analyses company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Center for Economic Analyses nor R Street Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Economic Analyses nor R Street Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Economic Analyses nor R Street Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Economic Analyses nor R Street Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Economic Analyses nor R Street Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Economic Analyses nor R Street Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X