Comparison Overview

Center for Cultural Affairs

VS

Departamento Nacional de Planeación

Center for Cultural Affairs

1315 E 10th St, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Center for Cultural Affairs at the O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs advances the understanding of the place of arts and culture in public life. The CCA facilitates a network of scholars and practitioners interested in advancing cultural affairs research, produces high-quality and relevant research on arts and cultural policy and management issues, and serves as a resource to the arts and cultural sector.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Departamento Nacional de Planeación

Calle 26 # 13-19 , Bogotá, D.C., 110311, CO
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

El Departamento Nacional de Planeación es la entidad técnica del Estado, encargada de liderar, coordinar y articular la planeación de mediano y largo plazo para el desarrollo sostenible e incluyente de Colombia. Su principal tarea es la formulación del Plan Nacional de Desarrollo y juega un papel muy importante en la administración del Presupuesto General de la Nación. Su director es el abogado Alexander López Maya.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 1,176
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-cultural-affairs.jpeg
Center for Cultural Affairs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/departamento-nacional-de-planeacion.jpeg
Departamento Nacional de Planeación
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Cultural Affairs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Departamento Nacional de Planeación
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Cultural Affairs in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Departamento Nacional de Planeación in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Cultural Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Cultural Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Departamento Nacional de Planeación (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Departamento Nacional de Planeación cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-cultural-affairs.jpeg
Center for Cultural Affairs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/departamento-nacional-de-planeacion.jpeg
Departamento Nacional de Planeación
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Departamento Nacional de Planeación company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Cultural Affairs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Departamento Nacional de Planeación company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Cultural Affairs company.

In the current year, Departamento Nacional de Planeación company and Center for Cultural Affairs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Departamento Nacional de Planeación company nor Center for Cultural Affairs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Departamento Nacional de Planeación company nor Center for Cultural Affairs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Departamento Nacional de Planeación company nor Center for Cultural Affairs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs company nor Departamento Nacional de Planeación company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs nor Departamento Nacional de Planeación holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Departamento Nacional de Planeación company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Center for Cultural Affairs company.

Departamento Nacional de Planeación company employs more people globally than Center for Cultural Affairs company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs nor Departamento Nacional de Planeación holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs nor Departamento Nacional de Planeación holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs nor Departamento Nacional de Planeación holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs nor Departamento Nacional de Planeación holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs nor Departamento Nacional de Planeación holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Cultural Affairs nor Departamento Nacional de Planeación holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H