Comparison Overview

Center for Contemporary Printmaking

VS

Joslyn Art Museum

Center for Contemporary Printmaking

299 West Avenue, Norwalk, CT, 06850, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.contemprints.org

A non-profit organization offering workshops, an Artist-in-Residence program, and a gallery with rotating exhibitions with particular emphasis on fine art printmaking: intaglio, lithography, silkscreen, woodblock printing, paper works, book arts, digital arts, monotypes, monoprints and edition printing. Housed in the beautiful, historic 5,000-square-foot 19th-century stone carriage house in Mathews Park, Norwalk, CT, CCP offices and gallery are open Mon.–Sat. from 9 AM to 5 PM, Sundays 12-5 PM. Handicapped accessible. For more information and special holiday hours, please visit www.contemprints.org or call 203-899-7999.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Joslyn Art Museum

undefined, undefined, undefined, 68102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.joslyn.org

Joslyn Art Museum was a gift to the people of Omaha from Sarah Joslyn in memory of her husband, George. From its first day, November 29, 1931, to today, the Museum has welcomed millions of visitors from around the world. The Joslyn’s collection of over 12,000 objects represents 5,000 years of human creativity and the world’s diverse cultures. The campus comprises three stunning buildings—distinct yet connected—surrounded by sculpture gardens. Learning and engagement opportunities abound, and general admission is free to all, always.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-contemporary-printmaking.jpeg
Center for Contemporary Printmaking
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joslyn-art-museum.jpeg
Joslyn Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Contemporary Printmaking
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Joslyn Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Contemporary Printmaking in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joslyn Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Center for Contemporary Printmaking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Contemporary Printmaking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Joslyn Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joslyn Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-contemporary-printmaking.jpeg
Center for Contemporary Printmaking
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joslyn-art-museum.jpeg
Joslyn Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Joslyn Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Contemporary Printmaking company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Joslyn Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Contemporary Printmaking company.

In the current year, Joslyn Art Museum company and Center for Contemporary Printmaking company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Joslyn Art Museum company nor Center for Contemporary Printmaking company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Joslyn Art Museum company nor Center for Contemporary Printmaking company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Joslyn Art Museum company nor Center for Contemporary Printmaking company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Contemporary Printmaking company nor Joslyn Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Contemporary Printmaking nor Joslyn Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Contemporary Printmaking company nor Joslyn Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Joslyn Art Museum company employs more people globally than Center for Contemporary Printmaking company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Center for Contemporary Printmaking nor Joslyn Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Contemporary Printmaking nor Joslyn Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Contemporary Printmaking nor Joslyn Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Contemporary Printmaking nor Joslyn Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Contemporary Printmaking nor Joslyn Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Contemporary Printmaking nor Joslyn Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References