Comparison Overview

Center for China and Globalization

VS

SD Strategies

Center for China and Globalization

#7 Guanghua Road, Hanwei Plaza, West Wing, Rm. 15B5, Beijing, undefined, 100004, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Center for China & Globalization(CCG)is a leading Chinese global think tank dedicated to the research and promotion of China and globalization, covering global talent migration, global governance, the globalization of Chinese enterprises and globalization strategy.   CCG is ranked in the Top 100 Think Tanks worldwide, the Best Independent Think Tank in China and in the Top 6 Think Tanks in China according to the world-renowned "2018 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report"​, released annually by the University of Pennsylvania's Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. CCG is currently the only non-governmental Chinese think tank to hold “UN Special Consultative Status”.   Follow CCG on all platforms! Twitter: @CCG _org Facebook: @CCGthinktank WeChat: CCGViews Weibo: weibo.com/ccgthoughts   You can also follow CCG President Dr. Wang Huiyao on Twitter here @HuiyaoWang

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SD Strategies

Kastanienallee 71, Berlin, Berlin, 10435, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

SD Strategies is a policy and communications consultancy. We focus on issues at the intersection of economic and social development, energy, and the environment. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, SD Strategies often works as a collaborative work-desk partnering with leading individuals and institutions from all over the world. Our partners and clients are governments, international organizations, civil society actors and representatives of the private sector. Still in its first year, SD Strategies was named Best Energy & Economic Development Consultancy and received the 2018 Clean Energy Award from Global Energy Review.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-china-and-globalization.jpeg
Center for China and Globalization
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sd-strategies.jpeg
SD Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for China and Globalization
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SD Strategies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for China and Globalization in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SD Strategies in 2025.

Incident History — Center for China and Globalization (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for China and Globalization cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SD Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SD Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-china-and-globalization.jpeg
Center for China and Globalization
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sd-strategies.jpeg
SD Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for China and Globalization company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SD Strategies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SD Strategies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for China and Globalization company.

In the current year, SD Strategies company and Center for China and Globalization company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SD Strategies company nor Center for China and Globalization company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SD Strategies company nor Center for China and Globalization company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SD Strategies company nor Center for China and Globalization company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for China and Globalization company nor SD Strategies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for China and Globalization nor SD Strategies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for China and Globalization company nor SD Strategies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for China and Globalization company employs more people globally than SD Strategies company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Center for China and Globalization nor SD Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for China and Globalization nor SD Strategies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for China and Globalization nor SD Strategies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for China and Globalization nor SD Strategies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for China and Globalization nor SD Strategies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for China and Globalization nor SD Strategies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X