Comparison Overview

Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT)

VS

Alpine Academy

Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT)

830 Ezzard Charles Drive, Cincinnati, OH, 45214, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.catsober.org

Join CAT in our mission to Save Lives and Rebuild Families. With over 50 years of expertise, we provide comprehensive addiction treatment services, mental health care, and family support tailored to individual needs. From medically monitored detox to after-care programs, our dedicated team provides patients and their loved ones with an extensive continuum of care essential to every recovery journey. Connect with us to learn more about our accredited and licensed services. Visit www.catsober.org for information.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Alpine Academy

1280 Whispering Horse Drive, Erda, UT, 84074, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alpineacademy.org

Alpine Academy is a licensed Residential Treatment Center for youth ages 12-18. Our students struggle with emotional disturbances and traumas that are severe enough to prevent them from being successful in school and interpersonal relationships. Alpine Academy maintains academic accreditation through AdvancEd. Alpine is also accredited by the Teaching-Family Association to use the Teaching-Family Model, a research-driven and evidence-based model proven to positively affect change in the lives of clients. Alpine Academy is a member of the National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs (NATSAP) and the National Association of Private Special Education Centers (NAPSEC). Alpine Academy is part of the Utah Youth Village, a non-profit organization that has been serving children and families in Utah since 1969.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 125
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-chemical-addictions-treatment.jpeg
Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpineacademy.jpeg
Alpine Academy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alpine Academy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alpine Academy in 2026.

Incident History — Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alpine Academy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpine Academy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-chemical-addictions-treatment.jpeg
Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpineacademy.jpeg
Alpine Academy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) company and Alpine Academy company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Alpine Academy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) company.

In the current year, Alpine Academy company and Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alpine Academy company nor Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alpine Academy company nor Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alpine Academy company nor Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) company nor Alpine Academy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) nor Alpine Academy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Alpine Academy company.

Alpine Academy company employs more people globally than Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) nor Alpine Academy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) nor Alpine Academy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) nor Alpine Academy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) nor Alpine Academy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) nor Alpine Academy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Addiction Treatment (CAT) nor Alpine Academy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References