Comparison Overview

Center for Art Law

VS

Bradley Moreau Title

Center for Art Law

195 Plymouth Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Welcome to Center for Art Law on LinkedIn. Our research and referral organization brings together artists and students, academics and legal practitioners, collectors and dealers, government officials and law enforcement officials involved and interested in art and cultural heritage creation and protection. Through academic work, educational and networking programs, mentoring, partnerships and consultations, we aim to explore all topics at the intersection of law and the arts. Learn about Center for Art Law newsletter: http://itsartlaw.com/archived-art-law-news-blasts/ Attend events and promote your art law programs through our calendar: http://itsartlaw.com/events/ Stay connected: www.itsartlaw.org www.facebook.com/center4artlaw https://twitter.com/itsartlaw

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bradley Moreau Title

1318 Camellia Boulevard, Lafayette, undefined, 70508, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bradley, Moreau, Howay & Stagg is dedicated to customer satisfaction. Whether you are a first time buyer or an established corporation looking for an easy and hassle free closing experience, we are here to help you purchase your home or commercial property. With our large and experienced team of attorneys and with a dedicated support staff, we work around the clock and on your schedule. We provide and efficient and easy closing on your property or building and the option to protect your investment with title insurance. Real Title and Bradley & Moreau take pride in putting our combined 161 years of experience and in putting our customers first. This is what makes Real Title...Real Easy.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-art-law.jpeg
Center for Art Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradley-moreau-title.jpeg
Bradley Moreau Title
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Art Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bradley Moreau Title
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Art Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bradley Moreau Title in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Art Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Art Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bradley Moreau Title (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bradley Moreau Title cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-art-law.jpeg
Center for Art Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradley-moreau-title.jpeg
Bradley Moreau Title
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bradley Moreau Title company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Art Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bradley Moreau Title company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Art Law company.

In the current year, Bradley Moreau Title company and Center for Art Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bradley Moreau Title company nor Center for Art Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bradley Moreau Title company nor Center for Art Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bradley Moreau Title company nor Center for Art Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Art Law company nor Bradley Moreau Title company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Art Law nor Bradley Moreau Title holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Center for Art Law company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bradley Moreau Title company.

Center for Art Law company employs more people globally than Bradley Moreau Title company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Center for Art Law nor Bradley Moreau Title holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Art Law nor Bradley Moreau Title holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Art Law nor Bradley Moreau Title holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Art Law nor Bradley Moreau Title holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Art Law nor Bradley Moreau Title holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Art Law nor Bradley Moreau Title holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X