Comparison Overview

Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology

VS

Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members

Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology

undefined, undefined, undefined, 30332-0620, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Our core competency in advanced communications technology and our reputation as an international, national, regional and state resource has made us a go-to entity. CACP operates as a neutral authority, monitoring and assessing related legislative and regulatory issues, identifying future options through horizon scanning techniques, and promotes a clearer understanding of the ever changing technology landscape.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members

8616 - 51 St NW, 300, Edmonton, Alberta, CA, T6E E6E
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

From the smallest village to the largest city, across every region of the province, Alberta Municipalities represents the communities where over 85% of Albertans live. Previously known as the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association (AUMA), Alberta Municipalities was founded in 1905 to provide urban and rural-region communities with a united voice. We work with elected and administrative leaders of Alberta's summer villages, villages, town, cities, and specialized municipalities to advocate for solutions to their common issues, which we categorize as economic, environment, governance, infrastructure, or social. And we help them build resilient and thriving communities by providing valuable services. We use our members' combined purchasing power to negotiate the best possible value and competitive pricing on employee benefits, insurance, energy, and other services needed to run an effective and efficient municipality. Alberta Municipalities has been successfully delivering innovative aggregated solutions to municipalities, municipally related not-for-profit organizations, and their employees. We provide substantial value to members through economies of scale, outstanding service and support, expertise that comes from working with municipalities and contribute to the advocacy efforts of the organization. We offer services including Employee Benefits, Retirement Services, Insurance and Risk Services, Investment Services, and Energy Services. Alberta Municipalities prides itself on being an accessible and inclusive organization. Our recruiting practices make every effort to ensure a fair and equitable selection process for each position.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-advanced-communications-policy-georgia-institute-of-technology.jpeg
Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abmunis.jpeg
Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-advanced-communications-policy-georgia-institute-of-technology.jpeg
Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abmunis.jpeg
Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company and Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company.

In the current year, Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members company and Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members company nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members company nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members company nor Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company nor Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology nor Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company nor Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members company employs more people globally than Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology nor Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology nor Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology nor Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology nor Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology nor Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Advanced Communications Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology nor Alberta Municipalities | Strength in Members holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H