Comparison Overview

Center for a Secure Free Society

VS

Florida Policy Institute

Center for a Secure Free Society

1440 G Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20009, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

The Center for a Secure Free Society (SFS) is a next generation, national security think tank advancing freedom and security in the Western Hemisphere and worldwide. With more than a decade of experience working in and with Latin America and the Caribbean, SFS is leading the effort to combat Venezuela, Russia, Iran, and China's expansion in our neighborhood. SFS is a bilingual think tank with content in English and Spanish produced by analysts with military, law enforcement, and intelligence experience working in Latin America and the Middle East. Our motto is that "there cannot be freedom without security, nor true security without freedom."

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Florida Policy Institute

255 Primera Blvd, Ste 160, Lake Mary, FL, 32746, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Florida Policy Institute is an independent, nonprofit and nonpartisan organization dedicated to promoting widespread prosperity through timely, thoughtful and objective analysis of state policy issues affecting economic opportunity. The Institute provides analysis of state budget and revenue trends and proposes common-sense policy options with the aim of encouraging broad public education, discussion, and informed action. The Institute advances fiscal policies that expand economic opportunity for all Florida residents. Our goal is to be an accurate, trusted source of information for policymakers, advocates, the media and the public at large.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-a-secure-free-society.jpeg
Center for a Secure Free Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-policy-institute.jpeg
Florida Policy Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for a Secure Free Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Florida Policy Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for a Secure Free Society in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Policy Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Center for a Secure Free Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for a Secure Free Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Florida Policy Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Policy Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-a-secure-free-society.jpeg
Center for a Secure Free Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-policy-institute.jpeg
Florida Policy Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Center for a Secure Free Society company and Florida Policy Institute company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Florida Policy Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for a Secure Free Society company.

In the current year, Florida Policy Institute company and Center for a Secure Free Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Florida Policy Institute company nor Center for a Secure Free Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Florida Policy Institute company nor Center for a Secure Free Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Florida Policy Institute company nor Center for a Secure Free Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society company nor Florida Policy Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Florida Policy Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society company nor Florida Policy Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Florida Policy Institute company employs more people globally than Center for a Secure Free Society company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Florida Policy Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Florida Policy Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Florida Policy Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Florida Policy Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Florida Policy Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Florida Policy Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X