Comparison Overview

Center for a Secure Free Society

VS

Center for Competition

Center for a Secure Free Society

1440 G Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20009, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.securefreesociety.org

The Center for a Secure Free Society (SFS) is a next generation, national security think tank advancing freedom and security in the Western Hemisphere and worldwide. With more than a decade of experience working in and with Latin America and the Caribbean, SFS is leading the effort to combat Venezuela, Russia, Iran, and China's expansion in our neighborhood. SFS is a bilingual think tank with content in English and Spanish produced by analysts with military, law enforcement, and intelligence experience working in Latin America and the Middle East. Our motto is that "there cannot be freedom without security, nor true security without freedom."

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Center for Competition

#26a Meunargia str. Tbilisi, Georgia, Tbilisi, 0101, GE
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.centerforcompetition.org

Center for Competition is a Non-Profit, Non-Governmental organisation registered under the laws of Georgia on 20.05.2015. Vision of the Center is Fair Competition for Business; Mission of the Center is to create fair competitive environment for business through enhancing competitiveness of private sector, development of competition culture, and policy advocacy. Objectives of the Center are: 1. Awareness raising in competition policy for different groups of stakeholders in order to develop competition culture in society; 2. Increase competitiveness of private companies in local and international markets by compliance programs, practical workshops and trainings which will stimulate businesses to comply with competition rules and business ethics voluntarily, align them to the best international standards and practices; 3. Identify the problems and needs of entrepreneurs with regard to competition policy; 4. Advocacy and defend the interests of private companies from unfair competition, improper state intervention or regulations; 5. To organise target-oriented public-private dialogue, meetings and round-tables for improving business environment. Main focus of the Center for Competition are on Small and Medium-sized Enterprises.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-a-secure-free-society.jpeg
Center for a Secure Free Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-competition.jpeg
Center for Competition
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for a Secure Free Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Competition
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for a Secure Free Society in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Competition in 2025.

Incident History — Center for a Secure Free Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for a Secure Free Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Competition (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Competition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-a-secure-free-society.jpeg
Center for a Secure Free Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-competition.jpeg
Center for Competition
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Competition company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for a Secure Free Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Competition company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for a Secure Free Society company.

In the current year, Center for Competition company and Center for a Secure Free Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Competition company nor Center for a Secure Free Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Competition company nor Center for a Secure Free Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Competition company nor Center for a Secure Free Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society company nor Center for Competition company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Center for Competition holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society company nor Center for Competition company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for a Secure Free Society company employs more people globally than Center for Competition company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Center for Competition holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Center for Competition holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Center for Competition holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Center for Competition holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Center for Competition holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor Center for Competition holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References