Comparison Overview

Center for a Secure Free Society

VS

NEW-e

Center for a Secure Free Society

1440 G Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20009, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.securefreesociety.org

The Center for a Secure Free Society (SFS) is a next generation, national security think tank advancing freedom and security in the Western Hemisphere and worldwide. With more than a decade of experience working in and with Latin America and the Caribbean, SFS is leading the effort to combat Venezuela, Russia, Iran, and China's expansion in our neighborhood. SFS is a bilingual think tank with content in English and Spanish produced by analysts with military, law enforcement, and intelligence experience working in Latin America and the Middle East. Our motto is that "there cannot be freedom without security, nor true security without freedom."

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NEW-e

undefined, Porto Alegre, RS, 90430-010, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
https://new-e.co

Oi! Seja bem-vind@! Estamos em transformação! Principalmente Digital. Estamos fazendo mudanças e adequações. Crescemos, evoluímos e expandimos nossa atuação. Lançamos uma identidade única para a NEW-e. Às vezes precisamos falar em nome das duas NEW-e(s) que já existem, assim como precisaremos falar das outras que virão. Hoje atuamos com curadoria, estudo, treinamento, intermediação e desenvolvimento de negócios, P&D, ciência, tecnologia, energia e pessoas (principalmente pessoas! :D ). Para isto existem duas NEW-e(s). A NEW-e Energy Evolutions, que nasceu como spin-off da UFRGS em 2012 - onde buscamos o desenvolvimento de tecnologias limpas para a geração de energia renovável em benefício do ambiente-, e a NEW-e Scitech Business Lab, que nasceu em 2017 como spin-off da primeira NEW-e - um laboratório de educação e negócios para spin-offs científico-tecnológicas. São negócios com finalidades diferentes, mas sob a mesma marca porque possuem a mesma base: a Ciência e a Tecnologia. Além de caminharem juntos e de forma complementar. A partir de agora estamos mais presentes no LinkedIn, abertos para responder perguntas, conversar, compartilhar conhecimento e, claro, fazer negócios. Estamos sempre à disposição! Fica à vontade e fala com a gente. Já pode chamar direto no Whats. ;) by.new-e.co/WhatsApp Seguimos em evolução e fazendo o que gostamos. Vai ser muito bom contar contigo. Avante!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-a-secure-free-society.jpeg
Center for a Secure Free Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bynewe.jpeg
NEW-e
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for a Secure Free Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEW-e
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for a Secure Free Society in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEW-e in 2025.

Incident History — Center for a Secure Free Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for a Secure Free Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEW-e (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEW-e cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-a-secure-free-society.jpeg
Center for a Secure Free Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bynewe.jpeg
NEW-e
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NEW-e company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for a Secure Free Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NEW-e company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for a Secure Free Society company.

In the current year, NEW-e company and Center for a Secure Free Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NEW-e company nor Center for a Secure Free Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NEW-e company nor Center for a Secure Free Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NEW-e company nor Center for a Secure Free Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society company nor NEW-e company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor NEW-e holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society company nor NEW-e company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for a Secure Free Society company employs more people globally than NEW-e company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor NEW-e holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor NEW-e holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor NEW-e holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor NEW-e holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor NEW-e holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for a Secure Free Society nor NEW-e holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References