Comparison Overview

Cenfri

VS

52Launch

Cenfri

Farm 1, Block A, The Vineyards Office Estate, Cape Town, 7530, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2008, Cenfri is an independent, not-for-profit development consultancy. We have physical offices in Cape Town and Kigali and have worked in more than 40 countries across Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America. ​​Find out more: https://cenfri.org/ ​ In collaboration with our partners, we undertake research and offer capacity building, convening and innovation support to businesses, governments, regulators and donors in Africa and beyond.​

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

52Launch

1602 Concord St, Framingham, Massachusetts, 01701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

52 Launch helps people with ideas get to market. How many times have we all said, "I had that idea"​ when we see an item on the shelf, TV or internet. There are over 7 billion people on this planet and each of us has an idea that could be revolutionary, disruptive, life-changing or just a better way to do something. There are three areas we help people with ideas... 1. We work for you, while you go to work! 2. We know exactly where to start and get your idea off the ground! 3. We have the resources and network to get an idea from napkin to market! There are many more reasons you'd consider us, but that's a good start!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cenfri.jpeg
Cenfri
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/52launch.jpeg
52Launch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cenfri
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
52Launch
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cenfri in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 52Launch in 2025.

Incident History — Cenfri (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cenfri cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 52Launch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

52Launch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cenfri.jpeg
Cenfri
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/52launch.jpeg
52Launch
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cenfri company and 52Launch company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, 52Launch company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cenfri company.

In the current year, 52Launch company and Cenfri company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 52Launch company nor Cenfri company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 52Launch company nor Cenfri company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 52Launch company nor Cenfri company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cenfri company nor 52Launch company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cenfri nor 52Launch holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cenfri company nor 52Launch company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cenfri company employs more people globally than 52Launch company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Cenfri nor 52Launch holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cenfri nor 52Launch holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cenfri nor 52Launch holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cenfri nor 52Launch holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cenfri nor 52Launch holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cenfri nor 52Launch holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X