Comparison Overview

Celloglas

VS

ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES

Celloglas

Business Support, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 4PF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Celloglas is the UK’s leading specialist in decorative print finishing, making print memorable for brands. Celloglas is a privately owned company with operations in the North, Midlands and South of England and we work with brand owners, marketing agencies, designers, publishers, printers and print management companies nationwide and globally. We offer an extensive range of innovative print finishes, including screen varnishing, lamination, foil blocking, high speed coating, die cutting and folder make up to name just a few -but our real value comes in our expertise to identify what finish will be perfect for what job. We provide a free consultancy service to our clients, knowledge sharing our findings over the years and exploring creative opportunities for clients. So often do we hear 'I'd have never thought of that!"​. We also own and manufacture Mirri, a world leading brand of metallised paper and board, which can be customised bespoke to reflect brand colours and tones. Our finishes are used across POS, publishing, marketing materials and packaging and we love a challenge - so please do task us with how to make your print memorable!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We, ARAFAH PRINTING PRESS L.L.C are glad to introduce ourselves to you as one of the leading commercial designing and printing agencies in UAE. With in a short span of time, we have successfully established our repute in the regional market as one of the most reliable agencies in terms of creativity, quality, pricing standards and value added personal services. Our facility consists of a large team of well-qualified marketing, designing and printing professionals who hold years of hard-core experience. With the most modern designing, printing and finishing equipments, we are capable of handling any type of assignments entrusted to us. We are committed to providing the most reliable and professionally tailored customer services. Count on us to continuously improve our standards, in order to ensure optimum output, to maintain consistent product and service quality, sometimes even to raise the standards of our clients as well along the way. Our dedication to meet any tight deadlines coupled with our strict quality control and personalized services have won us a clientele of international repute.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/celloglas.jpeg
Celloglas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Celloglas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Celloglas in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES in 2025.

Incident History — Celloglas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Celloglas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/celloglas.jpeg
Celloglas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Celloglas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Celloglas company.

In the current year, ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES company and Celloglas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES company nor Celloglas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES company nor Celloglas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES company nor Celloglas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Celloglas company nor ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Celloglas nor ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Celloglas company nor ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Celloglas company employs more people globally than ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Celloglas nor ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Celloglas nor ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Celloglas nor ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Celloglas nor ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Celloglas nor ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Celloglas nor ARAFAH GROUP OF COMPANIES holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N