Comparison Overview

Cell-media

VS

TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM)

Cell-media

130 Hay St, Subiaco, Western Australia, AU, 6008
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Cell-Media is a world-leading digital learning company that unlocks the potential in people, teams and enterprises alike. We do this through custom-designed online learning programs using the latest cloud-based technology. This enables us to help you deliver customised and interactive content at scale for all of your employees, contractors and visitors. Our end-to-end platform allows you to efficiently gather, manage and report on all training and safety data while easily updating content regularly to meet your evolving needs. As a digital partner, we’re proven, innovative and cutting-edge. Together, we help you take your digital learning to the next level, as well as your business performance. Reduce your costs yet boost your performance in health, safety, environment and quality compliance. Help your team build the future skills they need today with us.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM)

235 Carlaw Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M4M 2S1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 750 and 799

TAM is a strategy and learning solutions agency working across disciplines, sectors and cultures, to propel people and organizations towards their goals. We bring the joy of learning to people and organizations, through unforgettable learning experiences. We see learning design as a powerful tool for professional development and behaviour change. Learning leads to change. Change leads to growth. Let TAM help you get there. For over 15 years our multidisciplinary design team has focused on finding solutions that are as unique and exciting as the clients we work with. Whether we’re creating a learning strategy, designing virtual or instructor-led courses and resources, or developing innovative ways to deliver learning, we bring the best of ourselves to each and every new opportunity.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cellmedia-digitallearning.jpeg
Cell-media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuesdayafternoon-media-inc.jpeg
TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cell-media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cell-media in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) in 2025.

Incident History — Cell-media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cell-media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cellmedia-digitallearning.jpeg
Cell-media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuesdayafternoon-media-inc.jpeg
TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cell-media company and TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cell-media company.

In the current year, TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) company and Cell-media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) company nor Cell-media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) company nor Cell-media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) company nor Cell-media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cell-media company nor TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cell-media nor TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cell-media company nor TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) company employs more people globally than Cell-media company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Cell-media nor TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cell-media nor TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cell-media nor TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cell-media nor TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cell-media nor TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cell-media nor TuesdayAfternoon Media (TAM) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X