Comparison Overview

Celaya Law

VS

Vienna Kang Advocates

Celaya Law

1455 First St, 216, Napa, California, US, 94559
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

PROTECTION - We ensure that your hard-earned assets are protected for you and your loved ones from creditors, divorcées, taxes, and excessive probate costs. PEACE OF MIND - Our firm develops a strategy that will give you peace of mind knowing your loved ones, whatever their circumstances, are taken care of. PERSONAL TOUCH - At Celaya Law, we make a special effort to be accessible, high-touch attorneys. We have a no-cost, lifetime client care program to accommodate family and asset changes that inevitably come.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Vienna Kang Advocates

1310 Solihull Parkway, Solihull, West Midlands, B37 7YB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Expert UK Law Firm specialising in: Serious Criminal and Terrorism Law, Regulatory and Transport Law, Road Traffic Law, Family Law, Immigration Law & Judicial Review. Vienna Kang Advocates is a trading style of Vienna Kang Advocates Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority UIN: 613068. Vienna Kang Advocates is registered at Companies House in England and Wales under Registration Number 8353057 and a list of the names and professional qualifications of its Directors is available for inspection at the above address.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/celaya-law.jpeg
Celaya Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vienna-kang-advocates.jpeg
Vienna Kang Advocates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Celaya Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vienna Kang Advocates
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Celaya Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vienna Kang Advocates in 2025.

Incident History — Celaya Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Celaya Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vienna Kang Advocates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vienna Kang Advocates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/celaya-law.jpeg
Celaya Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vienna-kang-advocates.jpeg
Vienna Kang Advocates
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Celaya Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vienna Kang Advocates company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Vienna Kang Advocates company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Celaya Law company.

In the current year, Vienna Kang Advocates company and Celaya Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vienna Kang Advocates company nor Celaya Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vienna Kang Advocates company nor Celaya Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vienna Kang Advocates company nor Celaya Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Celaya Law company nor Vienna Kang Advocates company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Celaya Law nor Vienna Kang Advocates holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Celaya Law company nor Vienna Kang Advocates company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Vienna Kang Advocates company employs more people globally than Celaya Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Celaya Law nor Vienna Kang Advocates holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Celaya Law nor Vienna Kang Advocates holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Celaya Law nor Vienna Kang Advocates holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Celaya Law nor Vienna Kang Advocates holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Celaya Law nor Vienna Kang Advocates holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Celaya Law nor Vienna Kang Advocates holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X