Comparison Overview

Cedinsa SA

VS

Continental Print

Cedinsa SA

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cedinsa.com

CEDINSA S.A es una Empresa con más de 20 años de experiencia en el mercado de las impresiones especiales. Fabricamos y comercializamos Tarjetas Telefónicas y/o Pre-pago, Tickets Magnéticos, Tarjetas C-less, y otros productos afines. Productos de excelencia, equipamiento de última generación, y procesos de Control, nos permiten ofrecer un servicio ágil, confiable y de alta gama. Priorizamos una atención personalizada, fundada sobre la base de una relación permanente y dinámica, que permita el crecimiento de ambas partes. Concentramos nuestros esfuerzos en maximizar la reducción de costos, brindando soluciones competitivas y funcionales, a la medida de cada cliente. Operamos tanto en mercados nacionales, como internacionales.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Continental Print

140 E Averill, Sparta, Michigan, 49345, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.continentalid.com

For over 75 years Continental has been solving graphic problems with innovative technologies and dedicated service. Our mission is simple…to provide top quality solutions for your graphic needs. Whether this entails the exceptional detail of lithography, the rich colors and durability of screen printing, or efficient UV digital printing, our clients can be assured Continental’s craftsmen can handle the task. In the fast-paced ever-changing marketplace, quick turnaround times are more and more relevant. At Continental we make sure the job is done with top quality and on time, every time. Our knowledge of plastics, wood grains, metallized materials, polycarbonates, lenticular lenses, and reflective materials are just a few of the special substrates than can give a project that eye catching look. Laminating, embossing, foil stamping, doming and UV coatings are a few of the unique finishings Continental has perfected. Our services do not stop with your printed product. Continental has a complete fulfillment center that can perform everything from kit packing to drop shipping to website order taking, filling, tracking, and even e-mail confirmations. On time delivery and precise, safe packaging are a guarantee. G7 Master Certified.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedinsa-sa.jpeg
Cedinsa SA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental-identification-products.jpeg
Continental Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cedinsa SA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Continental Print
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedinsa SA in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Continental Print in 2025.

Incident History — Cedinsa SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedinsa SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Continental Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Continental Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedinsa-sa.jpeg
Cedinsa SA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental-identification-products.jpeg
Continental Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cedinsa SA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Continental Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Continental Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cedinsa SA company.

In the current year, Continental Print company and Cedinsa SA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Continental Print company nor Cedinsa SA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Continental Print company nor Cedinsa SA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Continental Print company nor Cedinsa SA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cedinsa SA company nor Continental Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cedinsa SA nor Continental Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cedinsa SA company nor Continental Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Continental Print company employs more people globally than Cedinsa SA company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Cedinsa SA nor Continental Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cedinsa SA nor Continental Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cedinsa SA nor Continental Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cedinsa SA nor Continental Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cedinsa SA nor Continental Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cedinsa SA nor Continental Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References