Comparison Overview

Cedato

VS

Swiggy

Cedato

1460 Broadway, New York, NY, 10036, US
Last Update: 2026-03-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cedato.com

Cedato is a programmatic operating system for modern video, offering publishers and advertisers a comprehensive SaaS-based video technology stack, enhancing value and viewing experience. We also operate one of the fastest growing private video marketplaces powering more than 15 Billion video impressions each month. Founded in 2015, Cedato is based in New York, Tel Aviv & Berlin. Visit www.cedato.com

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Swiggy

Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.swiggy.com

Swiggy is India’s pioneering on-demand convenience platform, catering to millions of consumers each month. Founded in 2014, its mission is to elevate the quality of life for the urban consumer by offering unparalleled convenience. With an extensive footprint in food delivery, Swiggy Food collaborates with nearly 2 lakh restaurants across 600+ cities. Swiggy Instamart, its quick commerce platform operating in 120+ cities, delivers groceries and other essentials across 40+ categories in 10 minutes. Fueled by a commitment to innovation, Swiggy continually incubates and integrates new services like Swiggy Dineout and Swiggy Genie into its multi-service app. Leveraging cutting-edge technology and Swiggy One, the country’s only membership program offering benefits across food, quick commerce, dining out, and pick-up and drop services, Swiggy aims to provide a superior experience to its consumers. For more information, visit www.swiggy.com

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 26,451
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedato.jpeg
Cedato
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiggy-in.jpeg
Swiggy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cedato
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swiggy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedato in 2026.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiggy in 2026.

Incident History — Cedato (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedato cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swiggy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiggy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedato.jpeg
Cedato
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiggy-in.jpeg
Swiggy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Swiggy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cedato company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Swiggy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cedato company.

In the current year, Swiggy company and Cedato company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swiggy company nor Cedato company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swiggy company nor Cedato company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Swiggy company nor Cedato company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cedato company nor Swiggy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cedato nor Swiggy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Swiggy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cedato company.

Swiggy company employs more people globally than Cedato company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Cedato nor Swiggy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cedato nor Swiggy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cedato nor Swiggy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cedato nor Swiggy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cedato nor Swiggy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cedato nor Swiggy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References