Comparison Overview

Cedar Rapids Museum of Art

VS

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens

Cedar Rapids Museum of Art

410 3rd Ave SE, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Cedar Rapids Museum of Art is to excite, engage, and educate through the arts. The Cedar Rapids Museum of Art houses more than 8,000 works of art spanning many eras—from Roman antiquity to the present. The collection is particularly strong in American art, especially from the first half of the 20th century. There are a number of artists the Museum holds in great depth—including the world's largest collection of works of art by Grant Wood. The Museum also possesses a strong collection of Roman portrait busts donated by Tom and Nan Riley, and an extensive print collection from the 15th century forward primarily donated by Peter O. Stamats. The collection is too comprehensive to be displayed all at once. That means chances are good that you'll see different, breathtaking pieces each time you visit!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens

1 Schenley Park, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Founded in 1893, Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens in Pittsburgh, Pa. is a green leader among public gardens with a mission to inspire and educate all with the beauty and importance of plants; to advance sustainability and promote human and environmental well-being through action and research; and to celebrate its historic glasshouse. Learn more: www.phipps.conservatory.org Connect with us: facebook.com/phippsconservatory instagram.com/phippsconservatory twitter.com/phippsnews youtube.com/user/phippsconservatory snapchat.com/add/phippsnews

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 157
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-rapids-museum-of-art.jpeg
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phipps-conservatory.jpeg
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedar Rapids Museum of Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens in 2025.

Incident History — Cedar Rapids Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedar Rapids Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-rapids-museum-of-art.jpeg
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phipps-conservatory.jpeg
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company and Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company nor Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company employs more people globally than Cedar Rapids Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cedar Rapids Museum of Art nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X