Comparison Overview

Cedar Group

VS

Emmerson Packaging

Cedar Group

Unit 3, Triton Centre, Romsey, Hampshire, SO51 9DJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cedargroup.uk.com

Cedar Group is renowned for its exceptional quality, accurate colour matching, use of specialist papers and precise finishing at our 20,000 sq ft premises in Romsey, UK. We create everything from high-end brochures and annual reports to magazines, personalised booklets and limited-edition prints. Cedar Packaging Group (CPG) and Cedar Group Agency (CGA) are at the heart of Cedar Group. CPG is a prestigious, award-winning manufacturer of luxury packaging and gifting. Whilst CGA provide operational and marketing agency support exclusively to the financial services sector. Email [email protected] for more information or visit www.cedargroup.uk.com to find out more about the services we have to offer.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Emmerson Packaging

12 Tupper Blvd, Amherst, Nova Scotia, B4H 4S7, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.emmersonpackaging.com

Emmerson Packaging, a flexographic printer and industry leader in flexible packaging solutions for over sixty years. That’s how long Emmerson Packaging has been helping great companies build their brands into some of the most successful in the marketplace in North America. Packaging is the window into your brand’s promise, your company’s values and vision. Like you, we know that it deeply matters how it looks, how it works and how it feels. Whatever direction you want to take with your flexographic packaging project, you can depend on Emmerson Packaging to deliver on-time and on-budget, while honoring a tradition of excellence in craftsmanship. To submit a resume please e-mail [email protected] for our Amherst location, or [email protected] for our Belleville location.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 211
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-group.jpeg
Cedar Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emmersonpackaging.jpeg
Emmerson Packaging
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cedar Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Emmerson Packaging
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedar Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emmerson Packaging in 2025.

Incident History — Cedar Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedar Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Emmerson Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emmerson Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-group.jpeg
Cedar Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emmersonpackaging.jpeg
Emmerson Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Emmerson Packaging company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cedar Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Emmerson Packaging company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cedar Group company.

In the current year, Emmerson Packaging company and Cedar Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Emmerson Packaging company nor Cedar Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Emmerson Packaging company nor Cedar Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Emmerson Packaging company nor Cedar Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cedar Group company nor Emmerson Packaging company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cedar Group nor Emmerson Packaging holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cedar Group company nor Emmerson Packaging company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Emmerson Packaging company employs more people globally than Cedar Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Cedar Group nor Emmerson Packaging holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cedar Group nor Emmerson Packaging holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cedar Group nor Emmerson Packaging holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cedar Group nor Emmerson Packaging holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cedar Group nor Emmerson Packaging holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cedar Group nor Emmerson Packaging holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References