Comparison Overview

Cedar Graphics

VS

BuildASign

Cedar Graphics

311 Parsons Dr, Hiawatha, Iowa, 52233, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Since 1986, Cedar Graphics has provided Iowa and the world with smarter ideas for their commercial printing and marketing needs. Conveniently located just north of Cedar Rapids in Hiawatha, our 96,000 ft2 facility is ideal for both regional clients and national distribution. Whether you are a graphic design firm needing unique finishing techniques or a large organization needing a new strategy to control costs or protect and manage your brand, Cedar Graphics can help. Family-owned and operated, our award-winning facility has positioned us as a national leader in UV offset printing, digital printing and finishing services. Our single-source approach means we can handle virtually any project from concept to completion. From annual reports, brochures, catalogs and business cards to corporate identity, postcards, posters, presentation folders, sales sheets, custom packaging and more, we do it all. In addition, Cedar Graphics can make your printing smarter and more efficient. Utilizing QR codes and pURL's we can track and measure the effectiveness of your campaigns or make your print marketing interactive. We can also create custom online store fronts that allow organizations to control their print costs and deliver customized marketing materials on demand to agents around the country. With green initiatives, online integration, printing solutions, and marketing strategies there is a reason our clients say Cedar Graphics is simply smarter. We are certain you will too.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BuildASign

11525 Stonehollow Dr., Austin, TX, 78758, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

BuildASign.com is an award-winning online custom printing provider of signage, apparel and home decor items. Since the company's inception in 2005, BuildASign.com has set out to empower every individual and business to connect with those that matter most to them. Our focus is making it easy and affordable for people to share their message or tell their story with custom and personalized products. We relentlessly innovate and improve to provide our customers with exceptional value and an experience that fosters a long-lasting relationship. Over the past 15 years, the Austin based company has grown to over 450 employees. BuildASign also operates EasyCanvasPrints.com and AlliedShirts.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 375
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-graphics.jpeg
Cedar Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buildasign-com.jpeg
BuildASign
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cedar Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BuildASign
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedar Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BuildASign in 2025.

Incident History — Cedar Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedar Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BuildASign (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BuildASign cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cedar-graphics.jpeg
Cedar Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buildasign-com.jpeg
BuildASign
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BuildASign company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cedar Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BuildASign company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cedar Graphics company.

In the current year, BuildASign company and Cedar Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BuildASign company nor Cedar Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BuildASign company nor Cedar Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BuildASign company nor Cedar Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cedar Graphics company nor BuildASign company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cedar Graphics nor BuildASign holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BuildASign company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cedar Graphics company.

BuildASign company employs more people globally than Cedar Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Cedar Graphics nor BuildASign holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cedar Graphics nor BuildASign holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cedar Graphics nor BuildASign holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cedar Graphics nor BuildASign holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cedar Graphics nor BuildASign holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cedar Graphics nor BuildASign holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N